Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMFPX vs VLPCX
SMFPX vs VLPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMFPX vs. VLPCX commentary
Jul 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMFPX is a Buy and VLPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMFPX has more cash in the bank: 1.26B vs. VLPCX (52.6M). SMFPX pays higher dividends than VLPCX: SMFPX (3.39) vs VLPCX (1.89). SMFPX was incepted earlier than VLPCX: SMFPX (13 years) vs VLPCX (10 years). VLPCX (2.51) is less costly to investors than SMFPX (2.15). SMFPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. VLPCX (46.00). SMFPX has a lower initial minimum investment than VLPCX: SMFPX (1000) vs VLPCX (2500). VLPCX (16.41) and SMFPX (16.15) have marching annual gain over last year. VLPCX return over 5 years is better than : 229.05 vs. SMFPX (158.03).
| SMFPX | VLPCX | SMFPX / VLPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.12 | 2.15 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.15 | 2.51 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.610 | -1.736 | -93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.26B | 52.6M | 2,392% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.39 | 1.89 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.15 | 16.41 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 75.43 | 76.38 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | 158.03 | 229.05 | 69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 25.56 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement