SMH
Price
$552.60
Change
+$2.12 (+0.39%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Net Assets
66.62B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXQ
Price
$89.38
Change
+$0.11 (+0.12%)
Updated
Sep 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.94B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMH vs SOXQ

SMH vs SOXQ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 22, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) vs. Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ)

Key Takeaways

  • Both ETFs provide targeted exposure to the semiconductor industry through passive indexing strategies but differ in index construction, with SMH tracking a 25-stock index and SOXQ tracking a 30-stock index.
  • SMH exhibits greater concentration in top holdings, particularly in leading artificial intelligence chip designers and manufacturers, while SOXQ offers modestly broader diversification across semiconductor firms.
  • Cost structure favors SOXQ with a 0.19% expense ratio compared to 0.35% for SMH, potentially enhancing long-term net returns for buy-and-hold investors.
  • Sector allocation for both is nearly 100% information technology, centered on semiconductor design, manufacturing, and equipment, exposing investors to shared cyclical risks tied to technology capital spending cycles.
  • Liquidity profiles reflect established market presence, with SMH maintaining higher trading volumes historically, while both support efficient execution for institutional and retail portfolios.
  • Relative positioning highlights SOXQ’s cost efficiency and slightly wider holdings as potential advantages in prolonged semiconductor sector expansions driven by artificial intelligence and electronics demand.

Introduction

The semiconductor sector remains central to technological advancement, powering artificial intelligence, data centers, consumer electronics, and automotive applications. Investors seeking pure-play exposure often compare SMH and SOXQ, two passive ETFs that target U.S.-listed semiconductor companies. These funds do not compete directly as identical products but serve as alternative vehicles within the same thematic universe, differing in index methodology, concentration, and fees. The comparison helps clarify structural distinctions that influence risk, cost, and alignment with investor objectives in a capital-intensive industry.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

SMH is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to replicate the performance of the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index before fees and expenses. The index selects the 25 largest U.S.-listed companies involved in semiconductor production and equipment. The ETF typically holds 26 securities and maintains a non-diversified structure. Top holdings commonly include NVDA, TSM, AVGO, AMD, and MU, with the top 10 often representing over 70% of assets. Sector allocation is essentially 100% information technology. The expense ratio stands at 0.35%. Rebalancing follows the underlying index rules, emphasizing market-capitalization weighting with liquidity considerations. Distinguishing features include a longer track record since 2011 and a focus on highly liquid leaders in the semiconductor supply chain.

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) Overview

SOXQ is a passive exchange-traded fund designed to track the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index before fees and expenses. The modified market-capitalization-weighted index measures the performance of the 30 largest U.S.-listed companies engaged in the semiconductor business. The ETF generally holds 31 securities and operates as a non-diversified fund. Prominent holdings typically feature NVDA, MU, AVGO, AMAT, and KLAC, with the top 10 accounting for approximately 58-63% of assets. Sector exposure concentrates nearly entirely in information technology. The expense ratio is 0.19%. The index undergoes annual reconstitution and quarterly rebalancing. Key characteristics encompass a lower cost profile and explicit targeting of the 30 largest participants in semiconductor design, manufacturing, and equipment.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor industry operates at the intersection of artificial intelligence innovation, advanced computing demand, and global electronics supply chains. Capital expenditures by technology leaders drive growth, while cyclical inventory adjustments and geopolitical tensions introduce volatility. Regulatory developments around export controls and domestic manufacturing incentives continue to shape competitive dynamics. Macroeconomic factors, including interest rate trajectories and corporate technology spending, influence sector momentum across market cycles. Both ETFs position investors for exposure to these durable themes without leverage or active management overlays, highlighting shared sensitivities to earnings growth in leading chip designers and equipment providers.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, semiconductor ETFs have exhibited pronounced sensitivity to artificial intelligence-related earnings announcements and broader technology spending trends. SMH’s higher concentration has historically amplified upside participation during periods of strength in top names but also contributed to elevated volatility relative to more evenly weighted peers. SOXQ’s modestly wider holdings and lower expense ratio may support more consistent relative positioning over extended horizons, particularly when sector rotation favors a broader set of participants. Both funds reflect the same underlying industry drivers, including memory and logic chip demand, yet structural differences in weighting produce observable divergences in risk-adjusted outcomes across interest rate and growth environments.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to uncover additional semiconductor and technology opportunities aligned with current market conditions.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including lower expense ratio, marginally broader diversification, and competitive exposure to semiconductor sector momentum, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable relative positioning to SOXQ for cost-conscious, long-term investors. Structural efficiency and reduced fee drag provide a measurable edge in prolonged holding periods, while the index’s inclusion of 30 constituents supports resilience across varying market cycles. Investors should evaluate these characteristics against personal risk tolerance and portfolio objectives.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SMH vs. SOXQ commentary
Sep 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a StrongBuy and SOXQ is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 66.6B vs. SOXQ (2.94B). SOXQ has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: SOXQ (60.365) vs SMH (53.445). SMH was incepted earlier than SOXQ: SMH (15 years) vs SOXQ (5 years). SOXQ (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). SOXQ has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
SMHSOXQSMH / SOXQ
Gain YTD53.44560.36589%
Net Assets66.6B2.94B2,265%
Total Expense Ratio0.350.19184%
Turnover12.0024.0050%
Yield0.200.3163%
Fund Existence15 years5 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMHSOXQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
URA45.701.38
+3.11%
Global X Uranium ETF
UX29.940.49
+1.67%
Roundhill Uranium ETF
DARP57.280.40
+0.70%
Grizzle Growth ETF
ELM29.800.18
+0.61%
Elm Market Navigator ETF
MPV17.060.06
+0.33%
Barings Participation Investors