SMH
Price
$556.34
Change
-$22.00 (-3.80%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Net Assets
63.04B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SOXQ
Price
$91.18
Change
-$3.82 (-4.02%)
Updated
May 15 closing price
Net Assets
1.94B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMH vs SOXQ

Header iconSMH vs SOXQ Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs SOXQBanner chart's image
SMH vs SOXQ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) vs. Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ)

Key Takeaways

  • SMH tracks the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with 25 holdings, emphasizing the largest and most liquid semiconductor firms, while SOXQ follows the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index with ~30 holdings for broader U.S.-listed exposure.
  • SOXQ offers a lower expense ratio of 0.19% compared to SMH's 0.35%, providing cost efficiency for long-term holders in sector rotations.
  • SMH exhibits higher concentration with top holdings like NVDA (~17-18%), TSM (~10%), and AVGO (~7%), versus SOXQ's more capped weights around 8-10% per leader.
  • Both ETFs maintain 100% technology sector allocation focused on semiconductors, but SMH includes global U.S.-listed firms while SOXQ prioritizes U.S.-engaged companies.
  • SMH demonstrates superior liquidity with average daily volume exceeding 8 million shares, supporting efficient trading amid volatility, compared to SOXQ's ~1.5 million shares.
  • SMH's longer track record since 2000 contrasts with SOXQ's inception in 2021, offering proven resilience through multiple market cycles.

Introduction

SMH and SOXQ represent premier options for semiconductor ETF comparison, delivering targeted exposure to the high-growth chip industry powering AI, data centers, and computing. Both compete directly within the technology sector, tracking modified market-cap-weighted indexes of leading U.S.-listed semiconductor firms. Investors compare them for nuanced differences in concentration, costs, and liquidity amid surging AI infrastructure demand. As capital flows intensify into chips—driven by hyperscaler capex projected at $600-720 billion in 2026—these passive funds offer alternatives for sector exposure without single-stock risk, balancing growth potential against volatility in this cyclical space.

VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) Overview

The VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is a passive fund seeking to replicate the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index (MVSMHTR), which tracks the 25 largest and most liquid U.S.-exchange-listed companies involved in semiconductor production and equipment. At least 80% of assets are invested in index securities, including medium-cap and U.S.-listed foreign firms generating >50% revenue from semiconductors. It holds approximately 25-26 stocks, with top holdings including NVDA (16-18%), TSM (10%), INTC (7-8%), AVGO (7%), and AMD (6-7%). Sector allocation is 100% technology/semiconductors. The expense ratio is 0.35%. The index reconstitutes semi-annually (March/September) and rebalances quarterly (March/June/September/December), using modified market-cap weighting favoring liquidity and size. SMH boasts exceptional liquidity with average daily volume over 8 million shares and substantial AUM exceeding $60 billion, ideal for institutional trading.

Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) Overview

The Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF (SOXQ) is a passive ETF tracking the PHLX Semiconductor Sector Index, measuring the 30 largest U.S.-listed companies engaged in semiconductor design, manufacturing, and sales. It invests at least 90% of assets in index components. Holdings total ~30-32, with top positions like NVDA (9.98%), MU (9.92%), AVGO (9.22%), INTC (7.5%), and AMD (6.23%). Sector breakdown: ~80% semiconductors, 20% production equipment. Expense ratio stands at 0.19%. The index reconstitutes annually in September and rebalances quarterly (March/June/September/December), employing modified market-cap weighting with caps (e.g., top five at 8%). Liquidity is solid with ~1.5 million average daily shares and AUM around $1.9 billion.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The semiconductor sector underpins AI expansion, data centers, and edge computing, with global sales projected to hit $975 billion in 2026 amid a 26% growth surge fueled by gen-AI chips nearing $500 billion in revenue. Catalysts include hyperscaler capex booms from Microsoft, Amazon, and others, alongside high-bandwidth memory demand. Capital flows favor chip ETFs, with retail inflows topping $3.2 billion YTD into leaders like SMH. Regulatory scrutiny on export controls and CHIPS Act subsidies persist, while risks encompass cyclical downturns, geopolitical tensions over Taiwan, and supply chain disruptions. Macro drivers like interest rate paths influence valuations in this high-beta space.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, SMH has shown stronger relative positioning, benefiting from heavy weighting in AI leaders like NVDA and TSM, which drive outsized gains during earnings beats and AI hype. SOXQ, with broader diversification and caps, exhibits slightly lower volatility but trails in momentum-driven rallies, as seen in recent weeks' sector rotation toward mega-caps. Both capture upside from memory (e.g., MU) and equipment trends, yet SMH's liquidity aids resilience in volatile swings tied to rate expectations and geopolitics. Over months, performance converges on shared exposure, but SMH edges ahead in bull phases.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization (market cap), technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions in dynamic sectors like semiconductors. Explore it today to uncover ETF comparison insights and potential outperformers.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors SMH due to its superior liquidity profile, established track record through cycles, and structural alignment with top semiconductor momentum leaders. While SOXQ's lower costs and added diversification appeal for conservative positioning, SMH's concentration in high-conviction names enhances trend consistency amid AI-driven sector tailwinds, with probabilistic edge in relative performance over coming quarters based on observable flows and volatility metrics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
SMH vs. SOXQ commentary
May 18, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and SOXQ is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 63B vs. SOXQ (1.94B). SOXQ has a higher annual dividend yield than SMH: SOXQ (63.684) vs SMH (54.483). SMH was incepted earlier than SOXQ: SMH (14 years) vs SOXQ (5 years). SOXQ (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). SOXQ has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
SMHSOXQSMH / SOXQ
Gain YTD54.48363.68486%
Net Assets63B1.94B3,249%
Total Expense Ratio0.350.19184%
Turnover12.0024.0050%
Yield0.220.3464%
Fund Existence14 years5 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMHSOXQ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SOXQ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSDM51.02-0.06
-0.12%
PGIM Short Duration Mlt-Sect Bd ETF
MYN9.79-0.15
-1.50%
Blackrock Muniyield NEW York Quality Fund
PSCF60.15-1.02
-1.67%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Financials ETF
MVLL76.58-5.48
-6.68%
GraniteShares 2x Long MRVL Daily ETF
BIDG16.69-1.95
-10.46%
Leverage Shares 2X Long BIDU Daily ETF

SOXQ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOXQ has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SOXQ jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOXQ
1D Price
Change %
SOXQ100%
-4.02%
LRCX - SOXQ
85%
Closely correlated
-4.82%
AMAT - SOXQ
82%
Closely correlated
-0.89%
KLAC - SOXQ
80%
Closely correlated
-4.68%
MPWR - SOXQ
80%
Closely correlated
-3.96%
MKSI - SOXQ
80%
Closely correlated
-3.39%
More