The investment seeks to track the investment results (before fees and expenses) of the PHLX Semiconductor Index... Show more
The Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF seeks to track the investment results of the PHLX Semiconductor Index, a modified market-capitalization-weighted benchmark compiled by Nasdaq that measures the performance of the 30 largest U.S.-listed companies engaged in the semiconductor business. The fund generally invests at least 90% of its total assets in the securities that comprise the index and is classified as non-diversified, meaning its returns are heavily influenced by a small number of large holdings.
The portfolio holds approximately 30 to 33 securities, with a full 100% allocation to information technology. NVIDIA (NVDA) is the largest position at roughly 10% to 13% of assets, followed by Broadcom (AVGO) near 10%, Micron Technology (MU) in the high single digits, and smaller weightings in Applied Materials (AMAT), KLA (KLAC), Marvell Technology (MRVL), Lam Research (LRCX), ASML Holding (ASML), Intel (INTC), and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing (TSM). Net assets are in the low billions of dollars, and the fund charges a net expense ratio of 0.19%.
This concentrated, passive structure helps explain the ETF's behavior: its performance is largely a function of a handful of mega-cap chip leaders and the broader semiconductor cycle, rather than diversified, multi-sector positioning.
The semiconductor industry remains a central pillar of the global technology complex, driven by sustained investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure, cloud and data-center buildouts, and a recovering memory market. Demand for high-performance GPUs, AI accelerators, and custom silicon has supported outsized growth at the sector's largest names, while memory suppliers have benefited from firmer pricing for DRAM and high-bandwidth memory used in AI systems.
Beyond end-demand, the equipment and foundry segment reflects a longer capital-expenditure cycle. Suppliers of wafer-fabrication equipment and process-control tools are positioned to benefit as chipmakers expand leading-edge capacity, although this spending remains sensitive to interest rates, global economic growth, and trade and export-control policies. The result is an industry whose fundamentals are structurally strong but whose valuations and share prices remain volatile, reacting sharply to shifts in sentiment around the pace of AI spending.
SOXQ's recent price action has been range-bound with periods of elevated volatility. After reaching a 52-week high near $115 in the middle of the year, the fund gave back roughly 20% into a late-July trough, recovered through the middle of the summer, and has since consolidated. Over the trailing 30 days the ETF has declined approximately 5%, while the trailing three-month move is a decline of roughly 4%.
This behavior is consistent with the fund's concentration in a few high-beta holdings. NVIDIA and Broadcom, which together represent a substantial share of the portfolio, have an outsized influence on the ETF's direction, while Micron's sensitivity to the memory pricing cycle adds another layer of volatility. The equipment names—Applied Materials, KLA, Lam Research, and ASML—introduce cyclicality tied to fab investment and export restrictions. As a result, SOXQ tends to amplify sector-level swings rather than smooth them out.
The fund's low cost and pure-play structure have supported its appeal as a satellite allocation for investors seeking targeted semiconductor exposure, but the same concentration is the primary source of its drawdowns and rapid rebounds.
For investors looking to go beyond a single fund, the AI Screener from Tickeron offers an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery platform that scans thousands of securities using technical indicators, fundamentals, volatility measures, AI-generated signals, market trends, price patterns, and customizable filters. The tool is designed to help users surface trending securities, breakout candidates, and new trading opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, with industry-specific filters that complement a sector-focused strategy built around funds like SOXQ. Explore the AI Screener to streamline your research workflow.
Several structural factors are likely to shape SOXQ through 2026. The pace of AI capital expenditure at hyperscale cloud providers remains the dominant demand driver, with direct implications for NVIDIA, Broadcom, AMD, and Marvell. A sustained memory upcycle would disproportionately benefit Micron, while any slowdown in AI-related spending could quickly pressure the fund's largest holdings.
The interest-rate and inflation backdrop also matters. Semiconductors carry elevated valuations, making the sector sensitive to changes in long-term yields and to any repricing of future growth expectations. On the supply side, equipment makers such as Applied Materials, Lam Research, KLA, and ASML will be influenced by global fab investment plans and by export-control and trade policy developments.
Finally, competitive dynamics in AI silicon, the pace of earnings growth across major holdings, and fund flows into thematic semiconductor ETFs will all play a role. Investors should monitor these themes without expecting the fund's concentrated structure to moderate its volatility.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
The RSI Indicator for SOXQ moved out of oversold territory on July 30, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 23 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In of the 23 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at .
The Stochastic Oscillator shows that the ticker has stayed in the oversold zone for 9 days. The price of this ticker is presumed to bounce back soon, since the longer the ticker stays in the oversold zone, the more promptly an upward trend is expected.
Following a 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SOXQ advanced for three days, in of 346 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are .
SOXQ may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In of 315 cases where SOXQ Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are .
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on August 18, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on SOXQ as a result. In of 87 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) for SOXQ turned negative on August 24, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to turn lower in the coming weeks. Traders may want to sell the stock or buy put options. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 52 similar instances when the indicator turned negative. In of the 52 cases the stock turned lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of success at .
SOXQ moved below its 50-day moving average on August 18, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SOXQ declined for three days, the price rose further in of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are .
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
Category Technology