Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs STK
SMH vs STK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. STK commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Buy and STK is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 27.7B vs. STK (548M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than STK: SMH (22.084) vs STK (2.854). SMH was incepted earlier than STK: SMH (14 years) vs STK (16 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than STK (1.26). STK has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SMH | STK | SMH / STK | |
| Gain YTD | 22.084 | 2.854 | 774% |
| Net Assets | 27.7B | 548M | 5,055% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 1.26 | 28% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 40.00 | 38% |
| Yield | 0.37 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 16 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | STK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 83% | about 1 month ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -2.08% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -8.42% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -7.33% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -14.07% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 84% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
More | ||||
STK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that STK and LRCX have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STK and LRCX's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STK | 100% | -0.22% | ||
| LRCX - STK | 18% Poorly correlated | -7.33% | ||
| AMAT - STK | 17% Poorly correlated | -14.07% | ||
| TER - STK | 16% Poorly correlated | -2.15% | ||
| AAPL - STK | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| MSFT - STK | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
More | ||||