Ad is loading...
SMH vs TDIV
SMH vs TDIV Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs TDIV
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$261.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5.37M
CapitalizationN/A
First Trust NASDAQ Technology Div ETF
Price$81.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$125.86K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs TDIV Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
SMH vs. TDIV commentary
Nov 09, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Buy and TDIV is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 26B vs. TDIV (2.96B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than TDIV: SMH (49.265) vs TDIV (29.098). SMH was incepted earlier than TDIV: SMH (13 years) vs TDIV (12 years). TDIV has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| SMH | TDIV | SMH / TDIV | |
| Gain YTD | 49.265 | 29.098 | 169% |
| Net Assets | 26B | 2.96B | 877% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 43.00 | 42% |
| Yield | 0.46 | 1.61 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | TDIV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +2.44% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 90% Closely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | +3.16% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +4.12% | ||
More | ||||
TDIV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TDIV has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TDIV jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TDIV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TDIV | 100% | +1.16% | ||
| KLAC - TDIV | 83% Closely correlated | +2.46% | ||
| LRCX - TDIV | 82% Closely correlated | +3.16% | ||
| MCHP - TDIV | 80% Closely correlated | +0.80% | ||
| AMAT - TDIV | 80% Closely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| QCOM - TDIV | 79% Closely correlated | -0.05% | ||
More | ||||