Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs TECB
SMH vs TECB Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs TECB
SMH vs TECB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Annualized Return+97%
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. TECB commentary
Jun 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and TECB is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 66.4B vs. TECB (454M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than TECB: SMH (69.231) vs TECB (14.170). SMH was incepted earlier than TECB: SMH (14 years) vs TECB (6 years). TECB (0.30) has a lower expense ratio than SMH (0.35). TECB has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| SMH | TECB | SMH / TECB | |
| Gain YTD | 69.231 | 14.170 | 489% |
| Net Assets | 66.4B | 454M | 14,626% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.30 | 117% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 15.00 | 80% |
| Yield | 0.18 | 0.28 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | TECB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 90% | 12 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Annualized Return+97%
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +6.75% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +12.65% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +11.19% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +12.92% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | +3.50% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 79% Closely correlated | +9.53% | ||
More | ||||
TECB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TECB has been loosely correlated with PTC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TECB jumps, then PTC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TECB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TECB | 100% | +2.43% | ||
| PTC - TECB | 64% Loosely correlated | -12.36% | ||
| CEVA - TECB | 61% Loosely correlated | +10.82% | ||
| AMD - TECB | 61% Loosely correlated | +7.97% | ||
| PLTR - TECB | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| MRVL - TECB | 60% Loosely correlated | +11.13% | ||
More | ||||