Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs TIME
SMH vs TIME Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs TIME
SMH vs TIME Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Annualized Return+101%
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. TIME commentary
Jun 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and TIME is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 71.9B vs. TIME (14.5M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than TIME: SMH (79.685) vs TIME (8.603). SMH was incepted earlier than TIME: SMH (15 years) vs TIME (4 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than TIME (0.96). TIME has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| SMH | TIME | SMH / TIME | |
| Gain YTD | 79.685 | 8.603 | 926% |
| Net Assets | 71.9B | 14.5M | 495,862% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.96 | 36% |
| Turnover | 12.00 | 1555.00 | 1% |
| Yield | 0.18 | 9.09 | 2% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | TIME | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Annualized Return+101%
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +4.38% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +6.03% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +3.27% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +0.74% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | +4.12% | ||
More | ||||
TIME and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIME has been loosely correlated with AMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TIME jumps, then AMD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TIME | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIME | 100% | +1.82% | ||
| AMD - TIME | 65% Loosely correlated | +6.98% | ||
| CRWD - TIME | 62% Loosely correlated | +1.48% | ||
| SHOP - TIME | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.93% | ||
| ZS - TIME | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| MRVL - TIME | 57% Loosely correlated | +10.43% | ||
More | ||||