Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs TINY
SMH vs TINY Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs TINY
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$326.13
Change+$1.03 (+0.32%)
Volume$17.3M
Net Assets33.99B
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
Price$48.84
Change+$0.25 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.82M
SMH vs TINY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. TINY commentary
Nov 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and TINY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 34B vs. TINY (4.82M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than TINY: SMH (34.670) vs TINY (8.803). SMH was incepted earlier than TINY: SMH (14 years) vs TINY (4 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than TINY (0.58). TINY has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SMH | TINY | SMH / TINY | |
| Gain YTD | 34.670 | 8.803 | 394% |
| Net Assets | 34B | 4.82M | 705,541% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.58 | 60% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 45.00 | 33% |
| Yield | 0.30 | 0.18 | 161% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | TINY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 90% | 20 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| MPWR - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +1.77% | ||
More | ||||
TINY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINY has been loosely correlated with UCTT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TINY jumps, then UCTT could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINY | 100% | N/A | ||
| UCTT - TINY | 62% Loosely correlated | +2.84% | ||
| LRCX - TINY | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.19% | ||
| KLAC - TINY | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| AMAT - TINY | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
| ENTG - TINY | 58% Loosely correlated | +7.06% | ||
More | ||||