Ad is loading...
SMH vs TINY
SMH vs TINY Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs TINY
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$196.21
Change-$14.62 (-6.93%)
Volume$84.3K
Net Assets15.93B
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
Price$34.27
Change-$2.26 (-6.19%)
Volume$200
Net Assets4.09M
SMH vs TINY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. TINY commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and TINY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 15.9B vs. TINY (4.09M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than TINY: SMH (-12.941) vs TINY (-18.335). SMH was incepted earlier than TINY: SMH (13 years) vs TINY (3 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than TINY (0.58). TINY has a higher turnover SMH (18.00) vs SMH (18.00).
| SMH | TINY | SMH / TINY | |
| Gain YTD | -12.941 | -18.335 | 71% |
| Net Assets | 15.9B | 4.09M | 388,848% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.58 | 60% |
| Turnover | 18.00 | 42.00 | 43% |
| Yield | 0.51 | 0.01 | 3,894% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 84% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +17.16% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 90% Closely correlated | +17.31% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | +16.11% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +15.43% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +18.02% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +12.29% | ||
More | ||||
TINY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TINY has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TINY jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TINY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TINY | 100% | +13.12% | ||
| KLAC - TINY | 79% Closely correlated | +17.31% | ||
| LRCX - TINY | 78% Closely correlated | +18.02% | ||
| VECO - TINY | 78% Closely correlated | +12.97% | ||
| AMAT - TINY | 78% Closely correlated | +16.11% | ||
| ONTO - TINY | 77% Closely correlated | +26.30% | ||
More | ||||