Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMH vs XSW
SMH vs XSW Comparison
Open Charts SMH vs XSW
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$286.64
Change-$0.46 (-0.16%)
Volume$11.49K
Net Assets26.55B
SPDR® S&P Software & Services ETF
Price$184.93
Change+$1.53 (+0.83%)
Volume$101
Net Assets483.03M
SMH vs XSW Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMH vs. XSW commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMH is a Hold and XSW is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 26.5B vs. XSW (483M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than XSW: SMH (18.553) vs XSW (-2.878). SMH was incepted earlier than XSW: SMH (14 years) vs XSW (14 years). SMH (0.35) and XSW (0.35) have comparable expense ratios . XSW has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| SMH | XSW | SMH / XSW | |
| Gain YTD | 18.553 | -2.878 | -645% |
| Net Assets | 26.5B | 483M | 5,487% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.35 | 0.35 | 100% |
| Turnover | 15.00 | 41.00 | 37% |
| Yield | 0.37 | 0.06 | 591% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMH | XSW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -1.06% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 89% Closely correlated | -3.52% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 88% Closely correlated | -0.97% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | -2.01% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -2.73% | ||
More | ||||
XSW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XSW has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XSW jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XSW | 100% | -1.32% | ||
| HUBS - XSW | 76% Closely correlated | -2.00% | ||
| CRM - XSW | 76% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| ADSK - XSW | 76% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| QTWO - XSW | 74% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| PATH - XSW | 72% Closely correlated | -1.06% | ||
More | ||||