SMID
Price
$41.80
Change
+$0.44 (+1.06%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
221.73M
TGAFF
Price
$2.57
Change
+$1.57 (+157.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
280.48M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMID vs TGAFF

Header iconSMID vs TGAFF Comparison
Open Charts SMID vs TGAFFBanner chart's image
Smith-Midland
Price$41.80
Change+$0.44 (+1.06%)
Volume$6.07K
Capitalization221.73M
Taiga Building Products
Price$2.57
Change+$1.57 (+157.00%)
Volume$250
Capitalization280.48M
SMID vs TGAFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMID vs. TGAFF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMID is a Hold and TGAFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (SMID: $41.80 vs. TGAFF: $2.57)
Brand notoriety: SMID and TGAFF are both not notable
SMID represents the Construction Materials, while TGAFF is part of the Electronics Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMID: 58% vs. TGAFF: 84%
Market capitalization -- SMID: $221.73M vs. TGAFF: $280.48M
SMID [@Construction Materials] is valued at $221.73M. TGAFF’s [@Electronics Distributors] market capitalization is $280.48M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $75.44B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronics Distributors] industry ranges from $55.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $9.94B. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronics Distributors] industry is $8.25B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMID’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTGAFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SMID’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TGAFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMID is a better buy in the long-term than TGAFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMID’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TGAFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMID’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TGAFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TGAFF is a better buy in the short-term than SMID.

Price Growth

SMID (@Construction Materials) experienced а -3.17% price change this week, while TGAFF (@Electronics Distributors) price change was +157.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was +3.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-0.34% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

@Electronics Distributors (+3.87% weekly)

Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TGAFF($280M) has a higher market cap than SMID($222M). SMID has higher P/E ratio than TGAFF: SMID (18.41) vs TGAFF (8.44). SMID YTD gains are higher at: -5.983 vs. TGAFF (-7.220). TGAFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 82.1M vs. SMID (18.4M). TGAFF has more cash in the bank: 35.5M vs. SMID (7.1M). SMID has less debt than TGAFF: SMID (4.86M) vs TGAFF (177M). TGAFF has higher revenues than SMID: TGAFF (1.65B) vs SMID (91M).
SMIDTGAFFSMID / TGAFF
Capitalization222M280M79%
EBITDA18.4M82.1M22%
Gain YTD-5.983-7.22083%
P/E Ratio18.418.44218%
Revenue91M1.65B6%
Total Cash7.1M35.5M20%
Total Debt4.86M177M3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMID vs TGAFF: Fundamental Ratings
SMID
TGAFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8236
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
72
Overvalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4356
SMR RATING
1..100
3460
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4194
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9331
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TGAFF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as SMID (72). This means that TGAFF’s stock grew similarly to SMID’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as TGAFF (56). This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to TGAFF’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as TGAFF (60). This means that SMID’s stock grew similarly to TGAFF’s over the last 12 months.

SMID's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TGAFF (94). This means that SMID’s stock grew somewhat faster than TGAFF’s over the last 12 months.

TGAFF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMID (93). This means that TGAFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMID’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMIDTGAFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMID
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TGAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MCEM240.004.33
+1.84%
Monarch Cement Co. (The)
PUKPF12.71N/A
N/A
Prudential PLC
ADMQ0.04N/A
N/A
ADM Endeavors Inc.
TWMIF3.37N/A
N/A
Tidewater Midstream & Infrastructure Ltd.
TMSNY76.09-10.64
-12.27%
Temenos AG

SMID and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMID has been loosely correlated with BCC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMID jumps, then BCC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMID
1D Price
Change %
SMID100%
+1.06%
BCC - SMID
52%
Loosely correlated
+3.20%
USLM - SMID
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
KNF - SMID
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.26%
EXP - SMID
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.14%
CRH - SMID
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More

TGAFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TGAFF and PSGTY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TGAFF and PSGTY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TGAFF
1D Price
Change %
TGAFF100%
+157.00%
PSGTY - TGAFF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMID - TGAFF
2%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
THYCY - TGAFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IMYSF - TGAFF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - TGAFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More