SMIZF
Price
$7.25
Change
+$0.48 (+7.09%)
Updated
May 14 closing price
Capitalization
1.62B
WTBDY
Price
$9.98
Change
-$0.17 (-1.67%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
8.85B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMIZF vs WTBDY

Header iconSMIZF vs WTBDY Comparison
Open Charts SMIZF vs WTBDYBanner chart's image
Melia Hotels International SA
Price$7.25
Change+$0.48 (+7.09%)
Volume$250
Capitalization1.62B
Whitbread
Price$9.98
Change-$0.17 (-1.67%)
Volume$4.34K
Capitalization8.85B
SMIZF vs WTBDY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMIZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMIZF vs. WTBDY commentary
Jul 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMIZF is a Hold and WTBDY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 03, 2025
Stock price -- (SMIZF: $7.25 vs. WTBDY: $9.98)
Brand notoriety: SMIZF and WTBDY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMIZF: 106% vs. WTBDY: 90%
Market capitalization -- SMIZF: $1.62B vs. WTBDY: $8.85B
SMIZF [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $1.62B. WTBDY’s [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] market capitalization is $8.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $72.73B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $9.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMIZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWTBDY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SMIZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WTBDY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMIZF is a better buy in the long-term than WTBDY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMIZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTBDY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMIZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • WTBDY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WTBDY is a better buy in the short-term than SMIZF.

Price Growth

SMIZF (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WTBDY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +6.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was +3.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

WTBDY is expected to report earnings on May 16, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (+3.88% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WTBDY($8.85B) has a higher market cap than SMIZF($1.62B). WTBDY has higher P/E ratio than SMIZF: WTBDY (25.45) vs SMIZF (7.07). WTBDY YTD gains are higher at: 9.659 vs. SMIZF (-6.925). WTBDY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 886M vs. SMIZF (392M). WTBDY has higher revenues than SMIZF: WTBDY (2.63B) vs SMIZF (1.51B).
SMIZFWTBDYSMIZF / WTBDY
Capitalization1.62B8.85B18%
EBITDA392M886M44%
Gain YTD-6.9259.659-72%
P/E Ratio7.0725.4528%
Revenue1.51B2.63B57%
Total Cash138MN/A-
Total Debt3.04BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMIZF vs WTBDY: Fundamental Ratings
SMIZF
WTBDY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
448
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7369
SMR RATING
1..100
4194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8443
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMIZF's Valuation (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTBDY (79). This means that SMIZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTBDY’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's Profit vs Risk Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SMIZF (73). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew similarly to SMIZF’s over the last 12 months.

SMIZF's SMR Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTBDY (94). This means that SMIZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTBDY’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SMIZF (58). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew similarly to SMIZF’s over the last 12 months.

WTBDY's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMIZF (84). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMIZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMIZFWTBDY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMIZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WTBDY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PJRAX9.09N/A
N/A
PGIM Quant Solutions International Eq A
HGHIX36.54N/A
N/A
Hartford Healthcare I
IICAX11.57N/A
N/A
AMF Large Cap Equity AMF
WFMDX48.40N/A
N/A
Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Admin
FSCRX24.04N/A
N/A
Fidelity Small Cap Discovery

SMIZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMIZF and WTBDY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMIZF and WTBDY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMIZF
1D Price
Change %
SMIZF100%
N/A
WTBDY - SMIZF
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.63%
ATAT - SMIZF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.89%
MNRIF - SMIZF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHHEF - SMIZF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHCO - SMIZF
-0%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
More

WTBDY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTBDY has been loosely correlated with ACCYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTBDY jumps, then ACCYY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WTBDY
1D Price
Change %
WTBDY100%
-1.63%
ACCYY - WTBDY
35%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
IHG - WTBDY
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
HTHT - WTBDY
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.30%
H - WTBDY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NHHEF - WTBDY
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More