Advertisement
SMIZF vs WTBDY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMIZF is a Buy and WTBDY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SMIZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWTBDY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SMIZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- WTBDY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SMIZF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WTBDY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SMIZF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
- WTBDY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SMIZF (@Cable/Satellite TV) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WTBDY (@Cable/Satellite TV) price change was +2.34% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Cable/Satellite TV industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.19%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Cable/Satellite TV (+0.38% weekly)Companies that operate paid and subscriber-based broadcast facilities for cable and home satellite systems. Comcast Corp, Charter Communications, Inc. and DISH Network Corporation are some of the biggest cable/satellite TV providers. Customers typically pay a regular monthly fee to cable TV operators for unlimited access to a certain package of channels. Since the rising popularity of online streaming services have increased instances of cord-cutting among consumers, several cable operators have also diversified into internet services to milk the burgeoning appetite for internet-based content.
| SMIZF | WTBDY | SMIZF / WTBDY | |
| Capitalization | 2.11B | 7.25B | 29% |
| EBITDA | 605M | 957M | 63% |
| Gain YTD | 15.413 | 15.205 | 101% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.84 | 21.97 | 45% |
| Revenue | 2.04B | 2.92B | 70% |
| Total Cash | 303M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.51B | N/A | - |
SMIZF | WTBDY | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 27 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 30 Undervalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 42 | 57 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 40 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 28 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 35 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMIZF's Valuation (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTBDY (81). This means that SMIZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTBDY’s over the last 12 months.
SMIZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBDY (57). This means that SMIZF’s stock grew similarly to WTBDY’s over the last 12 months.
SMIZF's SMR Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WTBDY (93). This means that SMIZF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WTBDY’s over the last 12 months.
SMIZF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as WTBDY (47). This means that SMIZF’s stock grew similarly to WTBDY’s over the last 12 months.
WTBDY's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMIZF (63). This means that WTBDY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMIZF’s over the last 12 months.
| SMIZF | WTBDY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 46% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 57% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | 2 days ago 62% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 39% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 16 days ago 65% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 45% | 2 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
SMIZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SMIZF and WTBDY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMIZF and WTBDY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMIZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMIZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| WTBDY - SMIZF | 6% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| ATAT - SMIZF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.16% | ||
| MNRIF - SMIZF | 0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NHHEF - SMIZF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SHCO - SMIZF | -0% Poorly correlated | -2.18% | ||
More | ||||
WTBDY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WTBDY has been loosely correlated with ACCYY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WTBDY jumps, then ACCYY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To WTBDY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WTBDY | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| ACCYY - WTBDY | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| IHG - WTBDY | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| HTHT - WTBDY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
| H - WTBDY | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.25% | ||
| NHHEF - WTBDY | 13% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||