SMNNY
Price
$17.12
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 4 closing price
THLPF
Price
$28.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

SMNNY vs THLPF

Header iconSMNNY vs THLPF Comparison
Open Charts SMNNY vs THLPFBanner chart's image
Shimano
Price$17.12
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$41.37K
CapitalizationN/A
Thule Group AB
Price$28.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$536
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
SMNNY vs THLPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SMNNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
SMNNY vs. THLPF commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMNNY is a StrongSell and THLPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (SMNNY: $15.96 vs. THLPF: $28.00)
Brand notoriety: SMNNY and THLPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMNNY: 458% vs. THLPF: 99%
Market capitalization -- SMNNY: $13.84B vs. THLPF: $3.3B
SMNNY [@Recreational Products] is valued at $13.84B. THLPF’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $3.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMNNY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTHLPF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SMNNY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • THLPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, THLPF is a better buy in the long-term than SMNNY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMNNY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SMNNY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

SMNNY (@Recreational Products) experienced а -1.36% price change this week, while THLPF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.21%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-0.91% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMNNY($13.8B) has a higher market cap than THLPF($3.3B). THLPF has higher P/E ratio than SMNNY: THLPF (33.67) vs SMNNY (16.45). THLPF YTD gains are higher at: 5.660 vs. SMNNY (3.502). SMNNY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 164B vs. THLPF (1.32B). SMNNY has more cash in the bank: 419B vs. THLPF (233M). SMNNY has less debt than THLPF: SMNNY (2.37B) vs THLPF (2.85B). SMNNY has higher revenues than THLPF: SMNNY (611B) vs THLPF (9.05B).
SMNNYTHLPFSMNNY / THLPF
Capitalization13.8B3.3B419%
EBITDA164B1.32B12,443%
Gain YTD3.5025.66062%
P/E Ratio16.4533.6749%
Revenue611B9.05B6,755%
Total Cash419B233M179,828%
Total Debt2.37B2.85B83%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMNNY vs THLPF: Fundamental Ratings
SMNNY
THLPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5047
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8872
SMR RATING
1..100
8055
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5954
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3466
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

THLPF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMNNY (73). This means that THLPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMNNY’s over the last 12 months.

THLPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (72) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNNY (88). This means that THLPF’s stock grew similarly to SMNNY’s over the last 12 months.

THLPF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNNY (80). This means that THLPF’s stock grew similarly to SMNNY’s over the last 12 months.

THLPF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as SMNNY (59). This means that THLPF’s stock grew similarly to SMNNY’s over the last 12 months.

SMNNY's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as THLPF (66). This means that SMNNY’s stock grew similarly to THLPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMNNY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SMNNY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

SMNNY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMNNY has been loosely correlated with SHMDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMNNY jumps, then SHMDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMNNY
1D Price
Change %
SMNNY100%
-0.50%
SHMDF - SMNNY
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
MCFT - SMNNY
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.17%
NCBDY - SMNNY
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.16%
LNNGY - SMNNY
26%
Poorly correlated
-4.73%
FNKO - SMNNY
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.33%
More

THLPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that THLPF and GBBYF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that THLPF and GBBYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To THLPF
1D Price
Change %
THLPF100%
N/A
GBBYF - THLPF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BSFFF - THLPF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMNNY - THLPF
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
SHMDF - THLPF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PYHOF - THLPF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More