SMNUF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.36B
VZ
Price
$42.30
Change
-$0.10 (-0.24%)
Updated
Apr 29, 10:31 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
176.65B
83 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SMNUF vs VZ

Header iconSMNUF vs VZ Comparison
Open Charts SMNUF vs VZBanner chart's image
Pt Sarana Menara Nusantara, Tbk
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization3.36B
Verizon Communications
Price$42.30
Change-$0.10 (-0.24%)
Volume$59.38K
Capitalization176.65B
SMNUF vs VZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
VZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMNUF vs. VZ commentary
Apr 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMNUF is a Hold and VZ is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SMNUF: $0.03 vs. VZ: $42.39)
Brand notoriety: SMNUF: Not notable vs. VZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMNUF: 240% vs. VZ: 58%
Market capitalization -- SMNUF: $3.36B vs. VZ: $176.65B
SMNUF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $3.36B. VZ’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $176.65B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMNUF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SMNUF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMNUF is a better buy in the long-term than VZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

VZ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • VZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

SMNUF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VZ (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was -1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.58%.

Reported Earning Dates

VZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+3.34% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VZ($177B) has a higher market cap than SMNUF($3.36B). VZ has higher P/E ratio than SMNUF: VZ (15.37) vs SMNUF (13.53). VZ YTD gains are higher at: 9.610 vs. SMNUF (-30.578). SMNUF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.4T vs. VZ (40.1B). SMNUF has more cash in the bank: 855B vs. VZ (2.07B). VZ has less debt than SMNUF: VZ (175B) vs SMNUF (45.22T). SMNUF has higher revenues than VZ: SMNUF (11.28T) vs VZ (134B).
SMNUFVZSMNUF / VZ
Capitalization3.36B177B2%
EBITDA6.4T40.1B15,965%
Gain YTD-30.5789.610-318%
P/E Ratio13.5315.3788%
Revenue11.28T134B8,419%
Total Cash855B2.07B41,404%
Total Debt45.22T175B25,839%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMNUF vs VZ: Fundamental Ratings
SMNUF
VZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9522
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
1049
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5848
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3783
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
18n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VZ's Valuation (23) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SMNUF (32) in the null industry. This means that VZ’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

VZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SMNUF (100) in the null industry. This means that VZ’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNUF's SMR Rating (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VZ (49) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that SMNUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VZ’s over the last 12 months.

VZ's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Major Telecommunications industry is in the same range as SMNUF (58) in the null industry. This means that VZ’s stock grew similarly to SMNUF’s over the last 12 months.

SMNUF's P/E Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VZ (83) in the Major Telecommunications industry. This means that SMNUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than VZ’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
VZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
VZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FIVMX11.75N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor International Value A
BRLVX22.22N/A
N/A
American Beacon Man Lg Cp Value R5
CBLCX49.55N/A
N/A
Columbia Balanced C
DLRHX22.64N/A
N/A
Macquarie Healthcare R
CESGX11.13N/A
N/A
Coho Relative Value ESG

SMNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMNUF has been loosely correlated with TCMFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMNUF jumps, then TCMFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMNUF
1D Price
Change %
SMNUF100%
N/A
TCMFF - SMNUF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TELDF - SMNUF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VZ - SMNUF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
QBCRF - SMNUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRHBY - SMNUF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More