Ad is loading...
SMOG vs TAN
SMOG vs TAN Comparison
Open Charts SMOG vs TAN
VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF
Price$105.64
Change+$1.86 (+1.79%)
Volume$1.96K
Net Assets115.45M
Invesco Solar ETF
Price$31.73
Change+$1.01 (+3.29%)
Volume$13.64K
Net Assets687.36M
SMOG vs TAN Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMOG vs. TAN commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMOG is a Buy and TAN is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TAN has more net assets: 687M vs. SMOG (115M). SMOG has a higher annual dividend yield than TAN: SMOG (7.029) vs TAN (-4.257). SMOG was incepted earlier than TAN: SMOG (18 years) vs TAN (17 years). SMOG (0.61) has a lower expense ratio than TAN (0.71). TAN has a higher turnover SMOG (23.00) vs SMOG (23.00).
| SMOG | TAN | SMOG / TAN | |
| Gain YTD | 7.029 | -4.257 | -165% |
| Net Assets | 115M | 687M | 17% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.71 | 86% |
| Turnover | 23.00 | 43.00 | 53% |
| Yield | 1.58 | 0.58 | 273% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 17 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| SMOG | TAN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 10 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
TAN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TAN has been closely correlated with RUN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TAN jumps, then RUN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TAN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TAN | 100% | +3.19% | ||
| RUN - TAN | 83% Closely correlated | +10.35% | ||
| CSIQ - TAN | 80% Closely correlated | +6.30% | ||
| ENPH - TAN | 78% Closely correlated | +3.52% | ||
| FSLR - TAN | 78% Closely correlated | +5.17% | ||
| SEDG - TAN | 76% Closely correlated | +8.47% | ||
More | ||||