SMPL vs STKH
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMPL is a Hold and STKH is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SMPL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTKH’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SMPL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- STKH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SMPL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STKH’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SMPL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- STKH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
SMPL (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -1.43% price change this week, while STKH (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was +0.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.73%.
Reported Earning Dates
SMPL is expected to report earnings on Apr 02, 2025.
STKH is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2024.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (+0.73% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| SMPL | STKH | SMPL / STKH | |
| Capitalization | 3.4B | 408K | 832,598% |
| EBITDA | 234M | -28.96M | -808% |
| Gain YTD | -13.109 | -6.433 | 204% |
| P/E Ratio | 26.07 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 1.25B | 0 | - |
| Total Cash | 121M | 4.04M | 2,994% |
| Total Debt | 272M | 3.2M | 8,511% |
SMPL | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 60 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 72 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| SMPL | STKH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 72% | 11 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 65% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 66% | 11 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 67% | 11 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 65% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 69% | 11 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 65% | 20 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 67% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 64% | 11 days ago 90% |
SMPL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMPL has been loosely correlated with SJM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMPL jumps, then SJM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMPL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMPL | 100% | +1.68% | ||
| SJM - SMPL | 36% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
| FLO - SMPL | 36% Loosely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| CAG - SMPL | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| GIS - SMPL | 33% Loosely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| MDLZ - SMPL | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.24% | ||
More | ||||
STKH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that STKH and STKL have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STKH and STKL's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STKH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STKH | 100% | N/A | ||
| STKL - STKH | 26% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| CAG - STKH | 26% Poorly correlated | +0.12% | ||
| SMPL - STKH | 25% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| CYAN - STKH | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| USNA - STKH | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
More | ||||