SMREF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.1M
SNLGF
Price
$0.18
Change
-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
2.87M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SMREF vs SNLGF

Header iconSMREF vs SNLGF Comparison
Open Charts SMREF vs SNLGFBanner chart's image
Sun Summit Minerals
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization3.1M
SAN LORENZO GOLD
Price$0.18
Change-$0.01 (-5.26%)
Volume$27.54K
Capitalization2.87M
SMREF vs SNLGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SMREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SMREF vs. SNLGF commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMREF is a Hold and SNLGF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (SMREF: $0.06 vs. SNLGF: $0.18)
Brand notoriety: SMREF and SNLGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SMREF: 11% vs. SNLGF: 67%
Market capitalization -- SMREF: $3.1M vs. SNLGF: $2.87M
SMREF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.1M. SNLGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SMREF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSNLGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SMREF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SNLGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SMREF and SNLGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SMREF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SNLGF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SMREF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SNLGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNLGF is a better buy in the short-term than SMREF.

Price Growth

SMREF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -0.17% price change this week, while SNLGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +16.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMREF($3.1M) has a higher market cap than SNLGF($2.87M). SNLGF YTD gains are higher at: 439.092 vs. SMREF (-13.510).
SMREFSNLGFSMREF / SNLGF
Capitalization3.1M2.87M108%
EBITDA-8.16MN/A-
Gain YTD-13.510439.092-3%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash1.4MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SMREF: Fundamental Ratings
SMREF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
27
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
99
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SMREFSNLGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SMREF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SNLGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
STKS5.130.38
+8.00%
ONE Group Hospitality (The)
CTBI56.110.93
+1.69%
Community Trust Bancorp
BSM13.170.06
+0.46%
Black Stone Minerals LP
BLDR127.22-0.67
-0.52%
Builders FirstSource
HUSA9.42-0.88
-8.54%
Houston American Energy Corp

SMREF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SMREF and SNLGF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SMREF and SNLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMREF
1D Price
Change %
SMREF100%
-7.24%
SNLGF - SMREF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.49%
AZZTF - SMREF
20%
Poorly correlated
+6.17%
SOUHY - SMREF
15%
Poorly correlated
+2.54%
SMDZF - SMREF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SIERF - SMREF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SNLGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNLGF has been loosely correlated with WTRNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNLGF jumps, then WTRNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNLGF
1D Price
Change %
SNLGF100%
-0.49%
WTRNF - SNLGF
64%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CVWFF - SNLGF
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
PMYLF - SNLGF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CTJHY - SNLGF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTRYF - SNLGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More