Ad is loading...
SMRPX vs TMLAX
SMRPX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMRPX vs. TMLAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMRPX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.14B vs. TMLAX (125M). SMRPX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: SMRPX (4.35) vs TMLAX (3.54). SMRPX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: SMRPX (9 years) vs TMLAX (12 years). TMLAX (1.59) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.06). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TMLAX (55.00). TMLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: TMLAX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). TMLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.92 vs. SMRPX (12.31). SMRPX return over 5 years is better than : 179.71 vs. TMLAX (123.67).
| SMRPX | TMLAX | SMRPX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.59 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.06 | 1.59 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -8.741 | -8.194 | 107% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.14B | 125M | 909% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.35 | 3.54 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.31 | 14.92 | 83% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.20 | 18.63 | 205% |
| Returns for 5 years | 179.71 | 123.67 | 145% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -2.13 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...