Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SMRPX vs TMLAX
SMRPX vs TMLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SMRPX vs. TMLAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SMRPX is a Hold and TMLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMRPX has more cash in the bank: 1.24B vs. TMLAX (123M). SMRPX pays higher dividends than TMLAX: SMRPX (4.66) vs TMLAX (4.09). SMRPX was incepted earlier than TMLAX: SMRPX (10 years) vs TMLAX (13 years). TMLAX (1.56) is less costly to investors than SMRPX (1.05). SMRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 74.00 vs. TMLAX (55.00). TMLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SMRPX: TMLAX (1000) vs SMRPX (1000000). SMRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.05 vs. TMLAX (-0.90). SMRPX return over 5 years is better than : 157.40 vs. TMLAX (100.50).
| SMRPX | TMLAX | SMRPX / TMLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 1.56 | 65% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.05 | 1.56 | 67% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.198 | 2.584 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.24B | 123M | 1,005% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.66 | 4.09 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.05 | -0.90 | -117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 57.02 | 40.52 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 157.40 | 100.50 | 157% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 64.32 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement