It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SND’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTNRSF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SND’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNRSF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
SND (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) experienced а +5.82% price change this week, while TNRSF (@Oilfield Services/Equipment) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oilfield Services/Equipment industry was +0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.29%.
SND is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.
The oilfield services/equipment industry is involved in providing various equipment and services to oil and natural gas producers. These companies rent drilling rigs and/or provide services to build and maintain oil and gas wells. The performance of this industry is dependent on demand for oil and natural gas, which in turn is often driven by macroeconomic conditions or business cycles. Schlumberger NV, Halliburton Company, and Baker Hughes are some of the biggest oilfield services companies.
SND | TNRSF | SND / TNRSF | |
Capitalization | 78.3M | 18.8B | 0% |
EBITDA | 21.8M | 3.08B | 1% |
Gain YTD | -6.553 | -2.661 | 246% |
P/E Ratio | 66.67 | 9.58 | 696% |
Revenue | 306M | 11.8B | 3% |
Total Cash | 4.29M | 3.06B | 0% |
Total Debt | 49M | 472M | 10% |
SND | TNRSF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 78 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 63 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TNRSF's Valuation (24) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SND (92) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TNRSF’s stock grew significantly faster than SND’s over the last 12 months.
TNRSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SND (81) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TNRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SND’s over the last 12 months.
TNRSF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as SND (92) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TNRSF’s stock grew similarly to SND’s over the last 12 months.
TNRSF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SND (60) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TNRSF’s stock grew similarly to SND’s over the last 12 months.
TNRSF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SND (49) in the Construction Materials industry. This means that TNRSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SND’s over the last 12 months.
SND | TNRSF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago44% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago84% | 1 day ago33% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% | 1 day ago43% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago37% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago80% | 1 day ago43% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago76% | 1 day ago35% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago78% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago26% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago58% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
AUSF | 46.08 | 0.22 | +0.48% |
Global X Adaptive US Factor ETF | |||
LCDS | 61.90 | N/A | N/A |
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Sci Lg Cor ETF | |||
BJUN | 45.49 | N/A | -0.01% |
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF™ - June | |||
SPMD | 57.43 | -0.06 | -0.10% |
SPDR® Portfolio S&P 400™ Mid Cap ETF | |||
FTXR | 35.00 | -0.05 | -0.14% |
First Trust Nasdaq Transportation ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SND has been loosely correlated with FTI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SND jumps, then FTI could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor tells us that TNRSF and GZPZF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TNRSF and GZPZF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNRSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
TNRSF | 100% | N/A | ||
GZPZF - TNRSF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
THNPY - TNRSF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.70% | ||
TS - TNRSF | 18% Poorly correlated | -2.65% | ||
SND - TNRSF | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.52% | ||
WYGPF - TNRSF | 15% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |