SNEX
Price
$123.82
Change
-$3.07 (-2.42%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.22B
72 days until earnings call
SPXCY
Price
$19.11
Change
+$0.18 (+0.95%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
7.76B
Ad is loading...

SNEX vs SPXCY

Header iconSNEX vs SPXCY Comparison
Open Charts SNEX vs SPXCYBanner chart's image
StoneX Group
Price$123.82
Change-$3.07 (-2.42%)
Volume$357.24K
Capitalization2.22B
Singapore Exchange
Price$19.11
Change+$0.18 (+0.95%)
Volume$9.81K
Capitalization7.76B
SNEX vs SPXCY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SNEX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SNEX vs. SPXCY commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNEX is a Hold and SPXCY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (SNEX: $123.82 vs. SPXCY: $19.11)
Brand notoriety: SNEX and SPXCY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SNEX: 165% vs. SPXCY: 70%
Market capitalization -- SNEX: $2.22B vs. SPXCY: $7.76B
SNEX [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $2.22B. SPXCY’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $7.76B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.67B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SNEX’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSPXCY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • SNEX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SPXCY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPXCY is a better buy in the long-term than SNEX.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SNEX’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SNEX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

SNEX (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +5.61% price change this week, while SPXCY (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was +1.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -2.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +28.87%.

Reported Earning Dates

SNEX is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-2.51% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXCY($7.76B) has a higher market cap than SNEX($2.22B). SPXCY has higher P/E ratio than SNEX: SPXCY (20.53) vs SNEX (8.75). SNEX YTD gains are higher at: 26.386 vs. SPXCY (3.298). SNEX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.27B vs. SPXCY (724M). SNEX has higher revenues than SPXCY: SNEX (67.4B) vs SPXCY (1.15B).
SNEXSPXCYSNEX / SPXCY
Capitalization2.22B7.76B29%
EBITDA1.27B724M175%
Gain YTD26.3863.298800%
P/E Ratio8.7520.5343%
Revenue67.4B1.15B5,866%
Total Cash1.16BN/A-
Total Debt8.05BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNEX vs SPXCY: Fundamental Ratings
SNEX
SPXCY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
95
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
51
SMR RATING
1..100
5126
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3740
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1123
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNEX's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCY (95). This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to SPXCY’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCY's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SNEX (5). This means that SPXCY’s stock grew similarly to SNEX’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCY's SMR Rating (26) in the null industry is in the same range as SNEX (51). This means that SPXCY’s stock grew similarly to SNEX’s over the last 12 months.

SNEX's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCY (40). This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to SPXCY’s over the last 12 months.

SNEX's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCY (23). This means that SNEX’s stock grew similarly to SPXCY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SNEX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SNEX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RMYAX9.48-0.02
-0.21%
Russell Inv Multi-Strategy Income A
JHQAX33.49-0.32
-0.95%
JPMorgan Hedged Equity A
EQTKX16.38-0.25
-1.50%
Shelton Equity Income Class K
HVEIX25.46-0.55
-2.11%
HVIA Equity Institutional
LACAX8.17-0.35
-4.11%
Columbia Acorn A

SNEX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SNEX has been loosely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SNEX jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNEX
1D Price
Change %
SNEX100%
-2.42%
PIPR - SNEX
57%
Loosely correlated
-3.14%
GS - SNEX
56%
Loosely correlated
-2.59%
SF - SNEX
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
MC - SNEX
55%
Loosely correlated
-3.11%
JEF - SNEX
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.69%
More

SPXCY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPXCY and SPXCF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPXCY and SPXCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXCY
1D Price
Change %
SPXCY100%
+0.92%
SPXCF - SPXCY
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SNEX - SPXCY
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.42%
OPY - SPXCY
22%
Poorly correlated
-2.63%
JPXGY - SPXCY
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.93%
TOP - SPXCY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More