SNGNF
Price
$3.16
Change
-$0.01 (-0.32%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
32.77B
TCMFF
Price
$1.85
Change
+$0.12 (+6.94%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.51M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SNGNF vs TCMFF

Header iconSNGNF vs TCMFF Comparison
Open Charts SNGNF vs TCMFFBanner chart's image
Singapore Telecommunications
Price$3.16
Change-$0.01 (-0.32%)
Volume$6.51K
Capitalization32.77B
Telecom Argentina S.A
Price$1.85
Change+$0.12 (+6.94%)
Volume$988
Capitalization1.51M
SNGNF vs TCMFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SNGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SNGNF vs. TCMFF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNGNF is a Buy and TCMFF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (SNGNF: $3.16 vs. TCMFF: $1.85)
Brand notoriety: SNGNF and TCMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Wireless Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SNGNF: 198% vs. TCMFF: 156%
Market capitalization -- SNGNF: $32.77B vs. TCMFF: $1.51M
SNGNF [@Wireless Telecommunications] is valued at $32.77B. TCMFF’s [@Wireless Telecommunications] market capitalization is $1.51M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry ranges from $12.88T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wireless Telecommunications] industry is $17.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SNGNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCMFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SNGNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCMFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SNGNF and TCMFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SNGNF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCMFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SNGNF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • TCMFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNGNF is a better buy in the short-term than TCMFF.

Price Growth

SNGNF (@Wireless Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TCMFF (@Wireless Telecommunications) price change was +48.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wireless Telecommunications industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.95%, and the average quarterly price growth was +45.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wireless Telecommunications (+2.05% weekly)

Wireless Telecom includes companies that sell wireless antenna or satellite-based communication services. This is the fastest-growing area in communications, as more and more communication and computing happen on mobile devices and cloud-based platforms. Wireless telecom is a key industry for global connectivity, and has even further room for growth in emerging markets and in rural parts of developed nations. People’s growing need for speed in data connectivity, higher resolution, and smoother video streaming and multimedia applications should drive growth and competition within this segment. T-Mobile US, Inc., Vodafone Group, and Sprint Corporation are some major providers of wireless telecom.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNGNF($32.8B) has a higher market cap than TCMFF($1.51M). SNGNF has higher P/E ratio than TCMFF: SNGNF (18.98) vs TCMFF (4.80). SNGNF YTD gains are higher at: 39.170 vs. TCMFF (-28.846). SNGNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.57B vs. TCMFF (-3.94B). TCMFF has more cash in the bank: 91.7B vs. SNGNF (1.67B). SNGNF has less debt than TCMFF: SNGNF (10.9B) vs TCMFF (606B). TCMFF has higher revenues than SNGNF: TCMFF (704B) vs SNGNF (14.6B).
SNGNFTCMFFSNGNF / TCMFF
Capitalization32.8B1.51M2,175,066%
EBITDA5.57B-3.94B-141%
Gain YTD39.170-28.846-136%
P/E Ratio18.984.80396%
Revenue14.6B704B2%
Total Cash1.67B91.7B2%
Total Debt10.9B606B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNGNF vs TCMFF: Fundamental Ratings
SNGNF
TCMFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3335
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
790
SMR RATING
1..100
9763
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
981
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNGNF's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as TCMFF (80). This means that SNGNF’s stock grew similarly to TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.

SNGNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCMFF (90). This means that SNGNF’s stock grew significantly faster than TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.

TCMFF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SNGNF (97). This means that TCMFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SNGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TCMFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SNGNF (43). This means that TCMFF’s stock grew similarly to SNGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TCMFF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNGNF (98). This means that TCMFF’s stock grew significantly faster than SNGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SNGNFTCMFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
47%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SNGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UFG2.640.22
+9.09%
Uni-Fuels Holdings Ltd
JZXN1.110.06
+5.24%
Jiuzi Holdings Inc.
ACON7.470.15
+1.98%
Aclarion Inc
PLMR132.520.75
+0.57%
Palomar Holdings
REXR37.620.04
+0.11%
Rexford Industrial Realty

SNGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNGNF and SGAPY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNGNF and SGAPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNGNF
1D Price
Change %
SNGNF100%
N/A
SGAPY - SNGNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.20%
SFTBY - SNGNF
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
SFTBF - SNGNF
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.07%
SOBKY - SNGNF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
TEFOF - SNGNF
11%
Poorly correlated
+2.52%
More

TCMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCMFF has been loosely correlated with SMNUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TCMFF jumps, then SMNUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCMFF
1D Price
Change %
TCMFF100%
+6.94%
SMNUF - TCMFF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TLKMF - TCMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TELDF - TCMFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPKKY - TCMFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.67%
SNGNF - TCMFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More