SNGNF
Price
$3.29
Change
+$0.04 (+1.23%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
54.94B
TCMFF
Price
$1.35
Change
+$0.15 (+12.50%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.32B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SNGNF vs TCMFF

Header iconSNGNF vs TCMFF Comparison
Open Charts SNGNF vs TCMFFBanner chart's image
Singapore Telecommunications
Price$3.29
Change+$0.04 (+1.23%)
Volume$412
Capitalization54.94B
Telecom Argentina S.A
Price$1.35
Change+$0.15 (+12.50%)
Volume$2.7K
Capitalization3.32B
SNGNF vs TCMFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SNGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SNGNF vs. TCMFF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNGNF is a StrongBuy and TCMFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (SNGNF: $3.29 vs. TCMFF: $1.35)
Brand notoriety: SNGNF and TCMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SNGNF: 12% vs. TCMFF: 440%
Market capitalization -- SNGNF: $54.94B vs. TCMFF: $3.32B
SNGNF [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $54.94B. TCMFF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $3.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $267.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.71B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SNGNF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCMFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SNGNF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCMFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SNGNF and TCMFF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SNGNF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCMFF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SNGNF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TCMFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNGNF is a better buy in the short-term than TCMFF.

Price Growth

SNGNF (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а +1.31% price change this week, while TCMFF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was +17.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +40.06%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-1.09% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNGNF($54.9B) has a higher market cap than TCMFF($3.33B). TCMFF has higher P/E ratio than SNGNF: TCMFF (93.83) vs SNGNF (17.67). SNGNF YTD gains are higher at: 45.006 vs. TCMFF (-48.077). TCMFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.28T vs. SNGNF (7.45B). TCMFF has more cash in the bank: 369B vs. SNGNF (2.77B). SNGNF has less debt than TCMFF: SNGNF (11.7B) vs TCMFF (4.74T). TCMFF has higher revenues than SNGNF: TCMFF (5.17T) vs SNGNF (14.1B).
SNGNFTCMFFSNGNF / TCMFF
Capitalization54.9B3.33B1,651%
EBITDA7.45B1.28T1%
Gain YTD45.006-48.077-94%
P/E Ratio17.6793.8319%
Revenue14.1B5.17T0%
Total Cash2.77B369B1%
Total Debt11.7B4.74T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNGNF vs TCMFF: Fundamental Ratings
SNGNF
TCMFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8391
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5100
SMR RATING
1..100
9686
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4634
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
991
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2055

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNGNF's Valuation (67) in the null industry is in the same range as TCMFF (80). This means that SNGNF’s stock grew similarly to TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.

SNGNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TCMFF (100). This means that SNGNF’s stock grew significantly faster than TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.

TCMFF's SMR Rating (86) in the null industry is in the same range as SNGNF (96). This means that TCMFF’s stock grew similarly to SNGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TCMFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SNGNF (46). This means that TCMFF’s stock grew similarly to SNGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TCMFF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SNGNF (99). This means that TCMFF’s stock grew significantly faster than SNGNF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SNGNFTCMFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SNGNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLCNX37.09N/A
N/A
Fidelity Contrafund K6
LGIEX21.70N/A
N/A
Franklin International Equity I
JORFX21.04N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Global Select I
HFDRX18.88N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps R3
CVAAX23.85-0.08
-0.33%
Calamos Select Fund A

SNGNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNGNF and SGAPY have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNGNF and SGAPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNGNF
1D Price
Change %
SNGNF100%
N/A
SGAPY - SNGNF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
SFTBY - SNGNF
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
SFTBF - SNGNF
12%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
SOBKY - SNGNF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.66%
TEFOF - SNGNF
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.04%
More

TCMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCMFF has been loosely correlated with SMNUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TCMFF jumps, then SMNUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCMFF
1D Price
Change %
TCMFF100%
+12.50%
SMNUF - TCMFF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TLKMF - TCMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TELDF - TCMFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPKKY - TCMFF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
SNGNF - TCMFF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More