SNGSF
Price
$0.07
Change
-$0.02 (-22.22%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
223.12M
WIPKF
Price
$30.40
Change
+$0.21 (+0.70%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.86B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SNGSF vs WIPKF

Header iconSNGSF vs WIPKF Comparison
Open Charts SNGSF vs WIPKFBanner chart's image
Singamas Container Holdings
Price$0.07
Change-$0.02 (-22.22%)
Volume$5.48K
Capitalization223.12M
Winpak
Price$30.40
Change+$0.21 (+0.70%)
Volume$6.76K
Capitalization1.86B
SNGSF vs WIPKF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SNGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WIPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SNGSF vs. WIPKF commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNGSF is a Hold and WIPKF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (SNGSF: $0.07 vs. WIPKF: $30.40)
Brand notoriety: SNGSF and WIPKF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Containers/Packaging industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SNGSF: 4% vs. WIPKF: 23%
Market capitalization -- SNGSF: $223.12M vs. WIPKF: $1.86B
SNGSF [@Containers/Packaging] is valued at $223.12M. WIPKF’s [@Containers/Packaging] market capitalization is $1.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Containers/Packaging] industry ranges from $66.8B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Containers/Packaging] industry is $5.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SNGSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWIPKF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SNGSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WIPKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SNGSF is a better buy in the long-term than WIPKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SNGSF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WIPKF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SNGSF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • WIPKF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNGSF is a better buy in the short-term than WIPKF.

Price Growth

SNGSF (@Containers/Packaging) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WIPKF (@Containers/Packaging) price change was +0.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.04%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Containers/Packaging (+0.71% weekly)

The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WIPKF($1.86B) has a higher market cap than SNGSF($223M). WIPKF has higher P/E ratio than SNGSF: WIPKF (13.57) vs SNGSF (5.09). WIPKF YTD gains are higher at: -8.982 vs. SNGSF (-19.558).
SNGSFWIPKFSNGSF / WIPKF
Capitalization223M1.86B12%
EBITDAN/A251M-
Gain YTD-19.558-8.982218%
P/E Ratio5.0913.5738%
RevenueN/A1.13B-
Total CashN/A356M-
Total DebtN/A17.8M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNGSF vs WIPKF: Fundamental Ratings
SNGSF
WIPKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3489
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
89
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8457
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNGSF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WIPKF (89). This means that SNGSF’s stock grew significantly faster than WIPKF’s over the last 12 months.

SNGSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WIPKF (100). This means that SNGSF’s stock grew similarly to WIPKF’s over the last 12 months.

SNGSF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WIPKF (100). This means that SNGSF’s stock grew similarly to WIPKF’s over the last 12 months.

WIPKF's Price Growth Rating (57) in the null industry is in the same range as SNGSF (84). This means that WIPKF’s stock grew similarly to SNGSF’s over the last 12 months.

WIPKF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SNGSF (100). This means that WIPKF’s stock grew similarly to SNGSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SNGSFWIPKF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
29%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SNGSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WIPKF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SROIX13.630.02
+0.15%
Calamos Antetokounmpo Sustainable Eqs I
EWMCX40.30N/A
N/A
Evercore Equity
COVUX13.66N/A
N/A
Columbia Overseas Value R
CBARX48.59N/A
N/A
Calvert Balanced R6
TEOOX10.05N/A
N/A
Transamerica Emerging Markets Eq R6

SNGSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNGSF and MNHFF have been poorly correlated (+0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNGSF and MNHFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNGSF
1D Price
Change %
SNGSF100%
N/A
MNHFF - SNGSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPKIF - SNGSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WIPKF - SNGSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SW - SNGSF
-2%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
VKSC - SNGSF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WIPKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WIPKF and SUMXF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WIPKF and SUMXF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WIPKF
1D Price
Change %
WIPKF100%
N/A
SUMXF - WIPKF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPKIF - WIPKF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCLAF - WIPKF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SW - WIPKF
0%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
MNHFF - WIPKF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More