Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SNGVX vs VMBSX
SNGVX vs VMBSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SNGVX vs. VMBSX commentary
Nov 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNGVX is a Hold and VMBSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VMBSX has more cash in the bank: 16.2B vs. SNGVX (201M). VMBSX pays higher dividends than SNGVX: VMBSX (4.15) vs SNGVX (3.76). SNGVX was incepted earlier than VMBSX: SNGVX (38 years) vs VMBSX (16 years). SNGVX (0.80) is less costly to investors than VMBSX (0.06). VMBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. SNGVX (25.55). VMBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than SNGVX: VMBSX (3000) vs SNGVX (5000). VMBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.40 vs. SNGVX (6.10). SNGVX return over 5 years is better than : 6.16 vs. VMBSX (-0.01).
| SNGVX | VMBSX | SNGVX / VMBSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.06 | 1,333% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.06 | 1,333% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.260 | 7.522 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 3000 | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 201M | 16.2B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.76 | 4.15 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.10 | 7.40 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.68 | 15.70 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.16 | -0.01 | -80,303% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.55 | 14.31 | 130% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement