SNMSF vs YAMCF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNMSF is a Hold and YAMCF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SNMSF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileYAMCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- SNMSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- YAMCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
SNMSF (@Recreational Products) experienced а +2.37% price change this week, while YAMCF (@Recreational Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.21%.
Reported Earning Dates
SNMSF is expected to report earnings on Mar 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Recreational Products (-0.91% weekly)The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).
| SNMSF | YAMCF | SNMSF / YAMCF | |
| Capitalization | 2.67B | 6.55B | 41% |
| EBITDA | 324M | 75.4B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | -8.971 | 7.467 | -120% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.20 | 24.33 | 67% |
| Revenue | 1.87B | 403B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 651M | 148B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 63.3M | 28.4B | 0% |
SNMSF | YAMCF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 81 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 45 Fair valued | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 51 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 68 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
YAMCF's Valuation (33) in the null industry is in the same range as SNMSF (45). This means that YAMCF’s stock grew similarly to SNMSF’s over the last 12 months.
YAMCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SNMSF (100). This means that YAMCF’s stock grew similarly to SNMSF’s over the last 12 months.
YAMCF's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as SNMSF (85). This means that YAMCF’s stock grew similarly to SNMSF’s over the last 12 months.
SNMSF's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as YAMCF (54). This means that SNMSF’s stock grew similarly to YAMCF’s over the last 12 months.
SNMSF's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for YAMCF (68). This means that SNMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than YAMCF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
SNMSF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SNMSF and MODG have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNMSF and MODG's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SNMSF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNMSF | 100% | +2.99% | ||
| MODG - SNMSF | 20% Poorly correlated | +3.84% | ||
| THUPY - SNMSF | 15% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
| SMNNY - SNMSF | 5% Poorly correlated | -0.87% | ||
| VIVC - SNMSF | 3% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| SHMDF - SNMSF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
YAMCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, YAMCF has been loosely correlated with CGROF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if YAMCF jumps, then CGROF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To YAMCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YAMCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| CGROF - YAMCF | 55% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| GDHG - YAMCF | 25% Poorly correlated | +12.34% | ||
| PYHOF - YAMCF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SNMSF - YAMCF | 1% Poorly correlated | +2.99% | ||
| THUPY - YAMCF | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.99% | ||
More | ||||