SNPMF
Price
$0.52
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
96.72B
STOHF
Price
$25.82
Change
+$0.05 (+0.19%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
94.57B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SNPMF vs STOHF

Header iconSNPMF vs STOHF Comparison
Open Charts SNPMF vs STOHFBanner chart's image
China Petroleum & Chemical
Price$0.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$17.36K
Capitalization96.72B
Equinor ASA
Price$25.82
Change+$0.05 (+0.19%)
Volume$351K
Capitalization94.57B
SNPMF vs STOHF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SNPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STOHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SNPMF vs. STOHF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNPMF is a Hold and STOHF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SNPMF: $0.52 vs. STOHF: $25.82)
Brand notoriety: SNPMF and STOHF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Integrated Oil industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SNPMF: 115% vs. STOHF: 191%
Market capitalization -- SNPMF: $96.72B vs. STOHF: $94.57B
SNPMF [@Integrated Oil] is valued at $96.72B. STOHF’s [@Integrated Oil] market capitalization is $94.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Integrated Oil] industry ranges from $461.22B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Integrated Oil] industry is $63.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SNPMF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTOHF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SNPMF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STOHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, STOHF is a better buy in the long-term than SNPMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SNPMF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STOHF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SNPMF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • STOHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SNPMF is a better buy in the short-term than STOHF.

Price Growth

SNPMF (@Integrated Oil) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while STOHF (@Integrated Oil) price change was +0.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Integrated Oil industry was +4.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

SNPMF is expected to report earnings on Apr 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Integrated Oil (+4.36% weekly)

Integrated oil companies are involved across nearly the entire oil value chain – from upstream operations like exploration and production, to downstream functions of refining and marketing. Exxon Mobil Corporation, Chevron Corporation and BP are major integrated oil companies. Their bottom lines’ response to crude oil prices could depend on the proportion of upstream vs. downstream businesses; for example, if a company has substantial downstream business, the adverse impact on their upstream business due to falling crude prices could be mitigated by benefits to its downstream business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SNPMF($96.7B) and STOHF($94.6B) have the same market capitalization . SNPMF has higher P/E ratio than STOHF: SNPMF (7.41) vs STOHF (3.37). STOHF YTD gains are higher at: 11.009 vs. SNPMF (-2.035). SNPMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 218B vs. STOHF (85.9B). SNPMF has more cash in the bank: 179B vs. STOHF (2.22B). STOHF has less debt than SNPMF: STOHF (32.2B) vs SNPMF (448B). SNPMF has higher revenues than STOHF: SNPMF (3.34T) vs STOHF (149B).
SNPMFSTOHFSNPMF / STOHF
Capitalization96.7B94.6B102%
EBITDA218B85.9B254%
Gain YTD-2.03511.009-18%
P/E Ratio7.413.37220%
Revenue3.34T149B2,240%
Total Cash179B2.22B8,063%
Total Debt448B32.2B1,391%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SNPMF vs STOHF: Fundamental Ratings
SNPMF
STOHF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7847
SMR RATING
1..100
7649
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5965
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SNPMF's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for STOHF (63). This means that SNPMF’s stock grew somewhat faster than STOHF’s over the last 12 months.

STOHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (78). This means that STOHF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

STOHF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (76). This means that STOHF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

STOHF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as SNPMF (63). This means that STOHF’s stock grew similarly to SNPMF’s over the last 12 months.

SNPMF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as STOHF (65). This means that SNPMF’s stock grew similarly to STOHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SNPMFSTOHF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SNPMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
STOHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLW30.130.28
+0.94%
Clearwater Paper Corp
APAM46.49-0.01
-0.02%
Artisan Partners Asset Management
MDRR10.50-0.01
-0.10%
Medalist Diversified REIT
TLK16.83-0.19
-1.12%
PT Telekomunikasi Indonesia
BDSX0.27-0.02
-5.37%
Biodesix

SNPMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SNPMF and PCCYF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SNPMF and PCCYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SNPMF
1D Price
Change %
SNPMF100%
N/A
PCCYF - SNPMF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
WDGJY - SNPMF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STOHF - SNPMF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
TTFNF - SNPMF
7%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
SEGYY - SNPMF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

STOHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STOHF has been loosely correlated with EQNR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if STOHF jumps, then EQNR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STOHF
1D Price
Change %
STOHF100%
+0.19%
EQNR - STOHF
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
E - STOHF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.68%
OMVKY - STOHF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
SHEL - STOHF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.50%
TTE - STOHF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.21%
More