Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SNTFX vs VFWPX
SNTFX vs VFWPX Comparison
Open Charts SNTFX vs VFWPX
Steward Values Enhanced International R6
Price$20.40
Change+$0.03 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets246.52M
Vanguard FTSE All-Wld ex-US Idx Ins Plus
Price$143.89
Change+$0.30 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.11B
SNTFX vs VFWPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SNTFX vs. VFWPX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SNTFX is a Buy and VFWPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VFWPX has more cash in the bank: 68.1B vs. SNTFX (247M). SNTFX pays higher dividends than VFWPX: SNTFX (2.91) vs VFWPX (2.68). SNTFX was incepted earlier than VFWPX: SNTFX (8 years) vs VFWPX (15 years). SNTFX (0.66) is less costly to investors than VFWPX (0.03). SNTFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.00 vs. VFWPX (5.00). SNTFX has a lower initial minimum investment than VFWPX: SNTFX (0) vs VFWPX (100000000). VFWPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.45 vs. SNTFX (1.04). VFWPX return over 5 years is better than : 39.21 vs. SNTFX (35.30).
| SNTFX | VFWPX | SNTFX / VFWPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.03 | 2,200% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.03 | 2,200% |
| Fund Existence | 8 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 21.830 | 20.252 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 247M | 68.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.91 | 2.68 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.04 | 14.45 | 7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.42 | 45.18 | 72% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.30 | 39.21 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 71.74 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement