SOBS
Price
$27.43
Change
+$0.63 (+2.35%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
SQCF
Price
$12.95
Change
+$0.20 (+1.57%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Ad is loading...

SOBS vs SQCF

Header iconSOBS vs SQCF Comparison
Open Charts SOBS vs SQCFBanner chart's image
Solvay Bank (NY)
Price$27.43
Change+$0.63 (+2.35%)
Volume$1.34K
CapitalizationN/A
Susquehanna Community Financial
Price$12.95
Change+$0.20 (+1.57%)
Volume$1.23K
CapitalizationN/A
SOBS vs SQCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SOBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SOBS vs. SQCF commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SOBS is a Hold and SQCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (SOBS: $27.43 vs. SQCF: $12.95)
Brand notoriety: SOBS and SQCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SOBS: 122% vs. SQCF: 47%
Market capitalization -- SOBS: $46.62M vs. SQCF: $33.64M
SOBS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $46.62M. SQCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $33.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SOBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSQCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SOBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SQCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SOBS is a better buy in the long-term than SQCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SOBS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SQCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SOBS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SQCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SOBS is a better buy in the short-term than SQCF.

Price Growth

SOBS (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.00% price change this week, while SQCF (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.31% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOBS($46.6M) has a higher market cap than SQCF($33.6M). SQCF has higher P/E ratio than SOBS: SQCF (14.15) vs SOBS (9.94). SQCF YTD gains are higher at: 20.227 vs. SOBS (-8.696). SOBS has higher revenues than SQCF: SOBS (22.3M) vs SQCF (7.83M).
SOBSSQCFSOBS / SQCF
Capitalization46.6M33.6M139%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-8.69620.227-43%
P/E Ratio9.9414.1570%
Revenue22.3M7.83M285%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A19.1M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SOBS vs SQCF: Fundamental Ratings
SOBS
SQCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
77100
SMR RATING
1..100
4972
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4228
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a11

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SOBS's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as SQCF (38). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's Profit vs Risk Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as SQCF (100). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SQCF (72). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to SQCF’s over the last 12 months.

SQCF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as SOBS (56). This means that SQCF’s stock grew similarly to SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

SQCF's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as SOBS (42). This means that SQCF’s stock grew similarly to SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SOBSSQCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
48%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
39%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SOBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SQCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
URE63.090.71
+1.14%
ProShares Ultra Real Estate
IAK127.381.13
+0.90%
iShares US Insurance ETF
IAGG50.010.06
+0.12%
iShares Core International Aggt Bd ETF
CVSB50.670.02
+0.04%
Calvert Ultra-Short Investment Grade ETF
PILL7.32-0.04
-0.54%
Direxion Daily Phrmctcl&MdclBl3XShrsETF

SOBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOBS and BNCZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOBS and BNCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOBS
1D Price
Change %
SOBS100%
+2.35%
BNCZF - SOBS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPIRF - SOBS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDGSF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAL - SOBS
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SQCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SQCF and PBAM have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SQCF and PBAM's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SQCF
1D Price
Change %
SQCF100%
+1.57%
PBAM - SQCF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
EMYB - SQCF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QCCO - SQCF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOBS - SQCF
7%
Poorly correlated
+2.35%
SSBP - SQCF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More