SOBS
Price
$26.50
Change
+$1.48 (+5.92%)
Updated
Jan 15 closing price
Capitalization
46.62M
SSBP
Price
$9.65
Change
-$0.35 (-3.50%)
Updated
Jan 10 closing price
Capitalization
16.59M
Ad is loading...

SOBS vs SSBP

Header iconSOBS vs SSBP Comparison
Open Charts SOBS vs SSBPBanner chart's image
Solvay Bank (NY)
Price$26.50
Change+$1.48 (+5.92%)
Volume$470
Capitalization46.62M
SSB Ban
Price$9.65
Change-$0.35 (-3.50%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization16.59M
SOBS vs SSBP Comparison Chart
Loading...
SOBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SOBS vs. SSBP commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SOBS is a Hold and SSBP is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (SOBS: $26.50 vs. SSBP: $9.65)
Brand notoriety: SOBS and SSBP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SOBS: 45% vs. SSBP: 245%
Market capitalization -- SOBS: $46.62M vs. SSBP: $16.59M
SOBS [@Regional Banks] is valued at $46.62M. SSBP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $16.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SOBS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSBP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SOBS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SSBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SOBS is a better buy in the long-term than SSBP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SOBS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSBP’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SOBS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SSBP’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SOBS is a better buy in the short-term than SSBP.

Price Growth

SOBS (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.92% price change this week, while SSBP (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SOBS($46.6M) has a higher market cap than SSBP($16.6M). SSBP has higher P/E ratio than SOBS: SSBP (13.48) vs SOBS (9.94). SOBS YTD gains are higher at: 1.884 vs. SSBP (-8.095). SOBS has higher revenues than SSBP: SOBS (22.3M) vs SSBP (6.93M).
SOBSSSBPSOBS / SSBP
Capitalization46.6M16.6M281%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.884-8.095-23%
P/E Ratio9.9413.4874%
Revenue22.3M6.93M322%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A24.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SOBS vs SSBP: Fundamental Ratings
SOBS
SSBP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8664
SMR RATING
1..100
5076
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4648
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSBP's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as SOBS (25). This means that SSBP’s stock grew similarly to SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

SSBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is in the same range as SOBS (86). This means that SSBP’s stock grew similarly to SOBS’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as SSBP (76). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to SSBP’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SSBP (55). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to SSBP’s over the last 12 months.

SOBS's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as SSBP (48). This means that SOBS’s stock grew similarly to SSBP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SOBSSSBP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
35%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
41%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
34%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
39%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
52%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SOBS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SSBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WOOD78.181.04
+1.35%
iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF
HFXI26.560.16
+0.61%
NYLI FTSE International Eq Ccy Netrl ETF
MEXX9.330.05
+0.54%
Direxion Dly MSCI Mexico Bull 3X ShsETF
HSUN34.500.07
+0.20%
Hartford Strategic Income ETF
STIP101.15-0.01
-0.01%
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF

SOBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SOBS and BNCZF have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOBS and BNCZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOBS
1D Price
Change %
SOBS100%
N/A
BNCZF - SOBS
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BPIRF - SOBS
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CHBAF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BDGSF - SOBS
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMAL - SOBS
7%
Poorly correlated
-5.57%
More

SSBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSBP and LSBK have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSBP and LSBK's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSBP
1D Price
Change %
SSBP100%
N/A
LSBK - SSBP
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PBCRY - SSBP
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.56%
SRNN - SSBP
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SQCF - SSBP
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
SOBS - SSBP
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More