It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SOMC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSUTNY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SOMC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUTNY’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
SOMC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SUTNY (@Regional Banks) price change was -6.67% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.
SOMC is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.
SUTNY is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
SOMC | SUTNY | SOMC / SUTNY | |
Capitalization | 84.3M | 14.3B | 1% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 25.521 | 28.119 | 91% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 10.30 | - |
Revenue | 31.2M | 1.14T | 0% |
Total Cash | 5.8M | N/A | - |
Total Debt | 33.7M | 17.12T | 0% |
SOMC | SUTNY | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 7 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 32 Undervalued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 24 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 7 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 43 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 92 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SUTNY's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as SOMC (32). This means that SUTNY’s stock grew similarly to SOMC’s over the last 12 months.
SUTNY's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOMC (63). This means that SUTNY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOMC’s over the last 12 months.
SOMC's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUTNY (100). This means that SOMC’s stock grew significantly faster than SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.
SOMC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SUTNY (47). This means that SOMC’s stock grew similarly to SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.
SOMC's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SUTNY (92). This means that SOMC’s stock grew similarly to SUTNY’s over the last 12 months.
SOMC | SUTNY | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago68% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago36% | 3 days ago66% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago38% | 3 days ago70% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 3 days ago65% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago53% | 3 days ago68% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago44% | 11 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago67% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago32% | 3 days ago73% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago54% | 3 days ago58% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SOMC and FCAP have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOMC and FCAP's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SOMC | 100% | -1.28% | ||
FCAP - SOMC | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
FFMR - SOMC | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SGBLY - SOMC | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.32% | ||
SUTNY - SOMC | 8% Poorly correlated | -2.06% | ||
SRNN - SOMC | 4% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUTNY has been closely correlated with MFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SUTNY jumps, then MFG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SUTNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SUTNY | 100% | -2.06% | ||
MFG - SUTNY | 71% Closely correlated | -2.03% | ||
DBSDY - SUTNY | 34% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
WF - SUTNY | 33% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
ONB - SUTNY | 31% Poorly correlated | -5.23% | ||
SHG - SUTNY | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.50% | ||
More |