It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SONVF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSSMXF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SONVF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SSMXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
SONVF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а +0.59% price change this week, while SSMXF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +3.94%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.62%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.17%.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
SONVF | SSMXF | SONVF / SSMXF | |
Capitalization | 16.6B | 7.93B | 209% |
EBITDA | 927M | 120B | 1% |
Gain YTD | -14.899 | -39.462 | 38% |
P/E Ratio | 24.17 | 20.34 | 119% |
Revenue | 3.87B | 491B | 1% |
Total Cash | 687M | 93B | 1% |
Total Debt | 1.76B | 55.7B | 3% |
SONVF | SSMXF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 79 | 38 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 17 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 91 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 93 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SONVF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as SSMXF (17). This means that SONVF’s stock grew similarly to SSMXF’s over the last 12 months.
SONVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as SSMXF (100). This means that SONVF’s stock grew similarly to SSMXF’s over the last 12 months.
SONVF's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSMXF (100). This means that SONVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSMXF’s over the last 12 months.
SONVF's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as SSMXF (91). This means that SONVF’s stock grew similarly to SSMXF’s over the last 12 months.
SONVF's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SSMXF (93). This means that SONVF’s stock grew similarly to SSMXF’s over the last 12 months.
SONVF | SSMXF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago49% | 2 days ago42% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago38% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago56% | 2 days ago36% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago34% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago62% | 2 days ago35% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago54% | 2 days ago35% |
Advances ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago64% | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago58% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago65% | 2 days ago29% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago50% | 2 days ago42% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
FNGD | 5.14 | 0.08 | +1.58% |
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ -3X Invrs Lvrgd ETN | |||
JETD | 7.14 | 0.08 | +1.18% |
MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | |||
LFAW | 174.63 | N/A | N/A |
LifeX 2060 Longevity Income ETF | |||
VTES | 101.65 | -0.01 | -0.01% |
Vanguard Short-Term Tax-Exmpt Bd ETF | |||
RWX | 27.56 | -0.25 | -0.90% |
SPDR® Dow Jones® International RelEstETF |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SONVF and SONVY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SONVF and SONVY's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SONVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SONVF | 100% | N/A | ||
SONVY - SONVF | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
VVOS - SONVF | 24% Poorly correlated | -4.62% | ||
BCCOY - SONVF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
BVS - SONVF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.06% | ||
SAUHY - SONVF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.47% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that SSMXF and OPK have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSMXF and OPK's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SSMXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
SSMXF | 100% | N/A | ||
OPK - SSMXF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.53% | ||
SONVY - SSMXF | 4% Poorly correlated | -0.25% | ||
SONVF - SSMXF | 3% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
SMMNY - SSMXF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
SNWV - SSMXF | 3% Poorly correlated | -21.58% | ||
More |