Advertisement
SOPA vs STFS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SOPA is a Hold and STFS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SOPA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSTFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SOPA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- STFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SOPA’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STFS’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SOPA’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- STFS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SOPA (@Advertising/Marketing Services) experienced а -27.41% price change this week, while STFS (@Advertising/Marketing Services) price change was -8.94% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Advertising/Marketing Services industry was -6.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +88.81%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Advertising/Marketing Services (-6.14% weekly)Making a brand known to people, garnering more clients/consumers for its product and solidifying the brand’s position in an industry – all of these are essential to a company’s growth, and that’s where marketing/advertising come in as one of the key catalysts. Advertising industry is a global multibillion-dollar business of public relations and marketing companies, media services and advertising agencies – entities that help to connect manufacturers/producers with customers. Digital media has played a big role in the growth of global advertising, and agencies invest substantially to integrate advanced technologies into their business operations. According to some estimates, the U.S. advertising industry is expected to generate revenue of $52.6 billion by 2023, up from almost $40 billion in 2015 . Omnicom Group Inc., Trade Desk, Inc. and Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. are some of the major U.S. companies in the industry.
| SOPA | STFS | SOPA / STFS | |
| Capitalization | 8.73M | 5.56M | 157% |
| EBITDA | -5.87M | 12.3M | -48% |
| Gain YTD | 59.243 | -97.685 | -61% |
| P/E Ratio | 0.06 | 22.84 | 0% |
| Revenue | 7.52M | 69.5M | 11% |
| Total Cash | 8.22M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 835K | N/A | - |
| SOPA | STFS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 11 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
Advertisement
SOPA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOPA has been loosely correlated with AIFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOPA jumps, then AIFF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOPA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOPA | 100% | -4.67% | ||
| AIFF - SOPA | 42% Loosely correlated | -3.07% | ||
| COIN - SOPA | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.72% | ||
| SEAC - SOPA | 36% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ATEN - SOPA | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
| LSAK - SOPA | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
More | ||||
STFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that STFS and BAOS have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STFS and BAOS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To STFS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STFS | 100% | +1.05% | ||
| BAOS - STFS | 3% Poorly correlated | -3.52% | ||
| IAS - STFS | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.44% | ||
| SWAG - STFS | -1% Poorly correlated | -13.91% | ||
| SOPA - STFS | -3% Poorly correlated | -4.67% | ||
| DRCT - STFS | -3% Poorly correlated | -9.99% | ||
More | ||||