Ad is loading...
SOSCF
Price
$0.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
YMZBY
Price
$218.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 1 closing price
93 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SOSCF vs YMZBY

Header iconSOSCF vs YMZBY Comparison
Open Charts SOSCF vs YMZBYBanner chart's image
Deoleo SA
Price$0.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$450
CapitalizationN/A
Yamazaki Baking
Price$218.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4
CapitalizationN/A
SOSCF vs YMZBY Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SOSCF vs. YMZBY commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SOSCF is a Hold and YMZBY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (SOSCF: $0.25 vs. YMZBY: $218.00)
Brand notoriety: SOSCF and YMZBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SOSCF: 100% vs. YMZBY: 6%
Market capitalization -- SOSCF: $14M vs. YMZBY: $3.81B
SOSCF [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $14M. YMZBY’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $3.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SOSCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileYMZBY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SOSCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • YMZBY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, YMZBY is a better buy in the long-term than SOSCF.

Price Growth

SOSCF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while YMZBY (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.

Reported Earning Dates

YMZBY is expected to report earnings on Feb 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
YMZBY($3.81B) has a higher market cap than SOSCF($14M). YMZBY has higher P/E ratio than SOSCF: YMZBY (44.26) vs SOSCF (0.11). YMZBY YTD gains are higher at: 44.812 vs. SOSCF (-0.398). YMZBY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 549M vs. SOSCF (107M). YMZBY has more cash in the bank: 1.25B vs. SOSCF (86.4M). SOSCF has less debt than YMZBY: SOSCF (269M) vs YMZBY (848M). YMZBY has higher revenues than SOSCF: YMZBY (9.57B) vs SOSCF (759M).
SOSCFYMZBYSOSCF / YMZBY
Capitalization14M3.81B0%
EBITDA107M549M19%
Gain YTD-0.39844.812-1%
P/E Ratio0.1144.260%
Revenue759M9.57B8%
Total Cash86.4M1.25B7%
Total Debt269M848M32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SOSCF: Fundamental Ratings
SOSCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
69
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
31

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HBLIX15.04-0.04
-0.27%
Hartford Balanced Income I
IEQAX16.81-0.05
-0.30%
ICON Equity Income Investor
MSECX13.06-0.10
-0.76%
Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq C
BREIX41.31-0.36
-0.86%
Baron Real Estate Institutional
ASCYX11.07-0.32
-2.81%
Alger Small Cap Growth Y

SOSCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SOSCF has been loosely correlated with ARZTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SOSCF jumps, then ARZTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SOSCF
1D Price
Change %
SOSCF100%
N/A
ARZTF - SOSCF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TYCMY - SOSCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
SHGXY - SOSCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YMZBY - SOSCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JWLLF - SOSCF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

YMZBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that YMZBY and WLMIF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that YMZBY and WLMIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To YMZBY
1D Price
Change %
YMZBY100%
N/A
WLMIF - YMZBY
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CELV - YMZBY
20%
Poorly correlated
+48.44%
RRSFF - YMZBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NSLYF - YMZBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOSCF - YMZBY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More