Advertisement
SOWG vs TR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SOWG is a Hold and TR is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
SOWG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- SOWG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SOWG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TR’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- SOWG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- TR’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
SOWG (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -2.29% price change this week, while TR (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was +1.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.64%.
Reported Earning Dates
SOWG is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2025.
TR is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.16% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| SOWG | TR | SOWG / TR | |
| Capitalization | 9.13M | 2.98B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -11.55M | 154M | -7% |
| Gain YTD | -63.382 | 30.775 | -206% |
| P/E Ratio | 4.65 | 32.80 | 14% |
| Revenue | 9.27M | 723M | 1% |
| Total Cash | 959K | 171M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 19M | 14.4M | 132% |
SOWG | TR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 3 | 18 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 97 | 68 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 44 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 98 | 19 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TR's Valuation (59) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SOWG (67) in the null industry. This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to SOWG’s over the last 12 months.
TR's Profit vs Risk Rating (45) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOWG (100) in the null industry. This means that TR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOWG’s over the last 12 months.
TR's SMR Rating (68) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as SOWG (97) in the null industry. This means that TR’s stock grew similarly to SOWG’s over the last 12 months.
TR's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SOWG (91) in the null industry. This means that TR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SOWG’s over the last 12 months.
TR's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for SOWG (98) in the null industry. This means that TR’s stock grew significantly faster than SOWG’s over the last 12 months.
| SOWG | TR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 49% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 63% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 8 days ago 47% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 59% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 56% |
Advertisement
SOWG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that SOWG and UMEWF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SOWG and UMEWF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SOWG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOWG | 100% | -1.54% | ||
| UMEWF - SOWG | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DDC - SOWG | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.91% | ||
| MKC - SOWG | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.11% | ||
| KHC - SOWG | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.22% | ||
| TR - SOWG | 12% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
More | ||||