SPHDF
Price
$9.42
Change
-$2.28 (-19.49%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
219.55M
XFOR
Price
$0.66
Change
-$0.08 (-10.81%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
125.39M
41 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SPHDF vs XFOR

Header iconSPHDF vs XFOR Comparison
Open Charts SPHDF vs XFORBanner chart's image
Santhera Pharmaceuticals Holdings
Price$9.42
Change-$2.28 (-19.49%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization219.55M
X4 Pharmaceuticals
Price$0.66
Change-$0.08 (-10.81%)
Volume$39.97M
Capitalization125.39M
SPHDF vs XFOR Comparison Chart
Loading...
SPHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XFOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SPHDF vs. XFOR commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPHDF is a Hold and XFOR is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (SPHDF: $9.42 vs. XFOR: $0.66)
Brand notoriety: SPHDF and XFOR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Biotechnology industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SPHDF: 107% vs. XFOR: 811%
Market capitalization -- SPHDF: $219.55M vs. XFOR: $125.39M
SPHDF [@Biotechnology] is valued at $219.55M. XFOR’s [@Biotechnology] market capitalization is $125.39M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Biotechnology] industry ranges from $379.55B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Biotechnology] industry is $2.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SPHDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileXFOR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SPHDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • XFOR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, XFOR is a better buy in the long-term than SPHDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SPHDF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while XFOR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SPHDF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • XFOR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, XFOR is a better buy in the short-term than SPHDF.

Price Growth

SPHDF (@Biotechnology) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while XFOR (@Biotechnology) price change was +27.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Biotechnology industry was -1.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

XFOR is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Biotechnology (-1.11% weekly)

Biotechnology involves genetic or protein engineering to produce medicines/therapies for treating and preventing ailments. The industry also provides crucial ingredients for diagnostics. This multi-billion-dollar industry is heavily focused on research and development, as companies attempt to continually come up with cutting-edge solutions for health. New discoveries for the treatment of diseases provide opportunities for growth for a company in this industry. Discoveries, however, must pass the regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before they can make it to markets. Amgen Inc., Gilead Sciences, Inc. and Celgene Corporation are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPHDF($220M) has a higher market cap than XFOR($125M). XFOR has higher P/E ratio than SPHDF: XFOR (3.10) vs SPHDF (1.48). SPHDF YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. XFOR (-9.746).
SPHDFXFORSPHDF / XFOR
Capitalization220M125M176%
EBITDAN/A-7.74M-
Gain YTD0.000-9.746-
P/E Ratio1.483.1048%
RevenueN/A1.12M-
Total CashN/A135M-
Total DebtN/A78.2M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPHDF vs XFOR: Fundamental Ratings
SPHDF
XFOR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4560
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
51
Fair valued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10095
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7946
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5490
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SPHDF's Valuation (51) in the null industry is in the same range as XFOR (56) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SPHDF’s stock grew similarly to XFOR’s over the last 12 months.

SPHDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as XFOR (100) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SPHDF’s stock grew similarly to XFOR’s over the last 12 months.

XFOR's SMR Rating (95) in the Biotechnology industry is in the same range as SPHDF (100) in the null industry. This means that XFOR’s stock grew similarly to SPHDF’s over the last 12 months.

XFOR's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Biotechnology industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPHDF (79) in the null industry. This means that XFOR’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPHDF’s over the last 12 months.

SPHDF's P/E Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for XFOR (90) in the Biotechnology industry. This means that SPHDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than XFOR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPHDFXFOR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SPHDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
XFOR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MARUF14.880.36
+2.48%
Marubeni Corp.
BZLFY21.480.31
+1.46%
Bunzl plc
SRUUF16.400.19
+1.17%
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust
QUEXF0.54N/A
N/A
Q2 METALS CORP
EADSY43.14-0.04
-0.09%
Airbus SE

SPHDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SPHDF has been closely correlated with TRML. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SPHDF jumps, then TRML could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPHDF
1D Price
Change %
SPHDF100%
N/A
TRML - SPHDF
78%
Closely correlated
+0.43%
COGT - SPHDF
63%
Loosely correlated
+3.44%
MEOBF - SPHDF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KROS - SPHDF
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.99%
CYTOF - SPHDF
35%
Loosely correlated
-8.25%
More