SPKKY
Price
$7.51
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.84B
TCMFF
Price
$1.29
Change
-$0.46 (-26.29%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
3.62B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SPKKY vs TCMFF

Header iconSPKKY vs TCMFF Comparison
Open Charts SPKKY vs TCMFFBanner chart's image
Spark New Zealand
Price$7.51
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$14.58K
Capitalization2.84B
Telecom Argentina S.A
Price$1.29
Change-$0.46 (-26.29%)
Volume$980
Capitalization3.62B
SPKKY vs TCMFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SPKKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SPKKY vs. TCMFF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPKKY is a Hold and TCMFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SPKKY: $7.51 vs. TCMFF: $1.29)
Brand notoriety: SPKKY and TCMFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SPKKY: 81% vs. TCMFF: 188%
Market capitalization -- SPKKY: $2.84B vs. TCMFF: $3.62B
SPKKY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $2.84B. TCMFF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $3.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $284.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SPKKY’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTCMFF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SPKKY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TCMFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPKKY is a better buy in the long-term than TCMFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SPKKY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TCMFF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SPKKY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TCMFF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SPKKY is a better buy in the short-term than TCMFF.

Price Growth

SPKKY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а -0.25% price change this week, while TCMFF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -26.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.28% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TCMFF($3.62B) has a higher market cap than SPKKY($2.84B). TCMFF has higher P/E ratio than SPKKY: TCMFF (93.83) vs SPKKY (18.73). SPKKY YTD gains are higher at: 5.903 vs. TCMFF (-50.385). TCMFF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.28T vs. SPKKY (1.46B). TCMFF has higher revenues than SPKKY: TCMFF (5.17T) vs SPKKY (5.67B).
SPKKYTCMFFSPKKY / TCMFF
Capitalization2.84B3.62B79%
EBITDA1.46B1.28T0%
Gain YTD5.903-50.385-12%
P/E Ratio18.7393.8320%
Revenue5.67B5.17T0%
Total CashN/A369B-
Total DebtN/A4.74T-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPKKY vs TCMFF: Fundamental Ratings
SPKKY
TCMFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1792
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8087
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
621
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SPKKY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TCMFF (80). This means that SPKKY’s stock grew somewhat faster than TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.

SPKKY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as TCMFF (100). This means that SPKKY’s stock grew similarly to TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.

SPKKY's SMR Rating (80) in the null industry is in the same range as TCMFF (87). This means that SPKKY’s stock grew similarly to TCMFF’s over the last 12 months.

TCMFF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SPKKY (49). This means that TCMFF’s stock grew similarly to SPKKY’s over the last 12 months.

TCMFF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SPKKY (62). This means that TCMFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SPKKY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPKKYTCMFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPKKY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TCMFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MEGRX179.45N/A
N/A
MFS Growth R2
FGROX27.74N/A
N/A
Emerald Growth Institutional
APITX13.85N/A
N/A
Yorktown Growth L
EKSDX6.21N/A
N/A
Allspring Diversified Income Bldr Adm
PIEJX30.66N/A
N/A
Principal Glb Emerging Markets J

SPKKY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPKKY and NZTCF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPKKY and NZTCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPKKY
1D Price
Change %
SPKKY100%
+0.01%
NZTCF - SPKKY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCI - SPKKY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
TLGPY - SPKKY
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.95%
KDDIY - SPKKY
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
KT - SPKKY
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
More

TCMFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TCMFF has been loosely correlated with SMNUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TCMFF jumps, then SMNUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TCMFF
1D Price
Change %
TCMFF100%
N/A
SMNUF - TCMFF
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TLKMF - TCMFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TELDF - TCMFF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SPKKY - TCMFF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.01%
SNGNF - TCMFF
2%
Poorly correlated
-6.25%
More