SPXCF
Price
$12.15
Change
-$0.79 (-6.11%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
13.67B
TMXXF
Price
$39.55
Change
-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
10.94B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SPXCF vs TMXXF

Header iconSPXCF vs TMXXF Comparison
Open Charts SPXCF vs TMXXFBanner chart's image
Singapore Exchange
Price$12.15
Change-$0.79 (-6.11%)
Volume$1.09K
Capitalization13.67B
TMX Group
Price$39.55
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$811
Capitalization10.94B
SPXCF vs TMXXF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SPXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SPXCF vs. TMXXF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SPXCF is a Hold and TMXXF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (SPXCF: $12.15 vs. TMXXF: $39.55)
Brand notoriety: SPXCF and TMXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SPXCF: 67% vs. TMXXF: 46%
Market capitalization -- SPXCF: $13.67B vs. TMXXF: $10.94B
SPXCF [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $13.67B. TMXXF’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $10.94B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $168.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $31.43B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SPXCF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTMXXF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SPXCF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TMXXF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SPXCF is a better buy in the long-term than TMXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SPXCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TMXXF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SPXCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TMXXF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TMXXF is a better buy in the short-term than SPXCF.

Price Growth

SPXCF (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -7.32% price change this week, while TMXXF (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -2.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.84%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+0.69% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SPXCF($13.7B) has a higher market cap than TMXXF($10.9B). TMXXF has higher P/E ratio than SPXCF: TMXXF (36.31) vs SPXCF (25.91). SPXCF YTD gains are higher at: 35.000 vs. TMXXF (28.128). TMXXF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.22B vs. SPXCF (888M). SPXCF has more cash in the bank: 1.51B vs. TMXXF (466M). SPXCF has less debt than TMXXF: SPXCF (688M) vs TMXXF (2.09B). TMXXF has higher revenues than SPXCF: TMXXF (1.59B) vs SPXCF (1.37B).
SPXCFTMXXFSPXCF / TMXXF
Capitalization13.7B10.9B126%
EBITDA888M2.22B40%
Gain YTD35.00028.128124%
P/E Ratio25.9136.3171%
Revenue1.37B1.59B86%
Total Cash1.51B466M324%
Total Debt688M2.09B33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SPXCF vs TMXXF: Fundamental Ratings
SPXCF
TMXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8756
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
216
SMR RATING
1..100
2872
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4655
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2125
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a39

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TMXXF's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCF (63). This means that TMXXF’s stock grew similarly to SPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

TMXXF's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as SPXCF (21). This means that TMXXF’s stock grew similarly to SPXCF’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TMXXF (72). This means that SPXCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TMXXF’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as TMXXF (55). This means that SPXCF’s stock grew similarly to TMXXF’s over the last 12 months.

SPXCF's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as TMXXF (25). This means that SPXCF’s stock grew similarly to TMXXF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SPXCFTMXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 21 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SPXCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TMXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GK25.190.18
+0.71%
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF
FIIG21.110.07
+0.33%
First Trust Intermediate DurInvGrdCrpETF
HGER24.700.05
+0.20%
Harbor Commodity All-Weather StrategyETF
AUGP29.890.05
+0.15%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Aug
EFAV85.150.03
+0.04%
iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF

SPXCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SPXCF and SPXCY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SPXCF and SPXCY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SPXCF
1D Price
Change %
SPXCF100%
N/A
SPXCY - SPXCF
32%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
OLKR - SPXCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+11.79%
QMCI - SPXCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+5.20%
PLSQF - SPXCF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMXXF - SPXCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
More

TMXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TMXXF and PIPR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TMXXF and PIPR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMXXF
1D Price
Change %
TMXXF100%
-0.02%
PIPR - TMXXF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.52%
JPXGY - TMXXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
RJF - TMXXF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.01%
HOOD - TMXXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.40%
EVR - TMXXF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More