SRAFF
Price
$0.21
Change
+$0.01 (+5.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
192.88M
SRCGF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.98M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRAFF vs SRCGF

Header iconSRAFF vs SRCGF Comparison
Open Charts SRAFF vs SRCGFBanner chart's image
Sandfire Resources America
Price$0.21
Change+$0.01 (+5.00%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization192.88M
HOMELAND NICKEL
Price$0.06
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$209K
Capitalization12.98M
SRAFF vs SRCGF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SRAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRAFF vs. SRCGF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRAFF is a StrongBuy and SRCGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SRAFF: $0.21 vs. SRCGF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: SRAFF and SRCGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRAFF: 13% vs. SRCGF: 248%
Market capitalization -- SRAFF: $192.88M vs. SRCGF: $12.98M
SRAFF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $192.88M. SRCGF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $12.98M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRAFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSRCGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SRAFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SRCGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRCGF is a better buy in the long-term than SRAFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRAFF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SRCGF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRAFF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SRCGF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SRAFF and SRCGF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SRAFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -4.13% price change this week, while SRCGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -6.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +4.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.89%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+4.20% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRAFF($193M) has a higher market cap than SRCGF($13M). SRCGF YTD gains are higher at: 328.000 vs. SRAFF (4.500). SRCGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.89M vs. SRAFF (-20.21M). SRCGF has more cash in the bank: 3.82M vs. SRAFF (1.77M). SRAFF (0) and SRCGF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SRAFFSRCGFSRAFF / SRCGF
Capitalization193M13M1,485%
EBITDA-20.21M-1.89M1,067%
Gain YTD4.500328.0001%
P/E RatioN/A1.26-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.77M3.82M46%
Total Debt63.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRAFF vs SRCGF: Fundamental Ratings
SRAFF
SRCGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
178
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8997
SMR RATING
1..100
10097
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7935
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRAFF's Valuation (87) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCGF (97). This means that SRAFF’s stock grew similarly to SRCGF’s over the last 12 months.

SRAFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as SRCGF (97). This means that SRAFF’s stock grew similarly to SRCGF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCGF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as SRAFF (100). This means that SRCGF’s stock grew similarly to SRAFF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCGF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRAFF (79). This means that SRCGF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRAFF’s over the last 12 months.

SRCGF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SRAFF (100). This means that SRCGF’s stock grew similarly to SRAFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRAFFSRCGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
56%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SRCGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMAC6.140.77
+14.34%
DiaMedica Therapeutics
PLUR5.020.17
+3.51%
Pluri
ELP9.120.16
+1.79%
Companhia Paranaense de Energia - COPEL
PENG24.870.16
+0.65%
Penguin Solutions Inc
SPGI538.06-2.20
-0.41%
S&P Global

SRAFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRAFF and EULIF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRAFF and EULIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRAFF
1D Price
Change %
SRAFF100%
+3.59%
EULIF - SRAFF
23%
Poorly correlated
+17.50%
ARRRF - SRAFF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.76%
SRCGF - SRAFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-5.40%
SXOOF - SRAFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-12.63%
SRHYY - SRAFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-14.46%
More

SRCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRCGF and IBATF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRCGF and IBATF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRCGF
1D Price
Change %
SRCGF100%
-5.40%
IBATF - SRCGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-8.91%
ATOXF - SRCGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+8.44%
NLIBF - SRCGF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ADBRF - SRCGF
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
SRLZF - SRCGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More