SRBT
Price
$0.40
Change
+$0.09 (+29.03%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
380.98K
WHLT
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.02 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRBT vs WHLT

Header iconSRBT vs WHLT Comparison
Open Charts SRBT vs WHLTBanner chart's image
Shanrong Biotechnology
Price$0.40
Change+$0.09 (+29.03%)
Volume$750
Capitalization380.98K
Chase Packaging
Price$0.08
Change-$0.02 (-20.00%)
Volume$38.5K
Capitalization1.43M
SRBT vs WHLT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SRBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRBT vs. WHLT commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRBT is a Hold and WHLT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (SRBT: $0.40 vs. WHLT: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: SRBT and WHLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRBT: 60% vs. WHLT: 120%
Market capitalization -- SRBT: $380.98K vs. WHLT: $1.43M
SRBT [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $380.98K. WHLT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRBT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWHLT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SRBT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WHLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SRBT and WHLT are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRBT’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHLT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRBT’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WHLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHLT is a better buy in the short-term than SRBT.

Price Growth

SRBT (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -13.05% price change this week, while WHLT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

WHLT is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WHLT($1.43M) has a higher market cap than SRBT($381K). SRBT YTD gains are higher at: 316.250 vs. WHLT (185.714).
SRBTWHLTSRBT / WHLT
Capitalization381K1.43M27%
EBITDAN/A-53.86K-
Gain YTD316.250185.714170%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/A0-
Total CashN/A432K-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRBT vs WHLT: Fundamental Ratings
SRBT
WHLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
94100
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3435
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10010
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRBT's Valuation (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHLT (80). This means that SRBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

SRBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (100). This means that SRBT’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

WHLT's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SRBT (100). This means that WHLT’s stock grew similarly to SRBT’s over the last 12 months.

SRBT's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as WHLT (35). This means that SRBT’s stock grew similarly to WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

WHLT's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SRBT (100). This means that WHLT’s stock grew significantly faster than SRBT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRBTWHLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRBT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BLNK0.960.05
+5.37%
Blink Charging Co
NBIX129.111.11
+0.87%
Neurocrine Biosciences
HLLY2.260.01
+0.44%
Holley
MTX59.100.15
+0.25%
Minerals Technologies
KAVL0.49N/A
N/A
Kaival Brands Innovations Group

SRBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRBT and TCRI have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRBT and TCRI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRBT
1D Price
Change %
SRBT100%
N/A
TCRI - SRBT
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SITS - SRBT
8%
Poorly correlated
-13.46%
IWSH - SRBT
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHLT - SRBT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - SRBT
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WHLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHLT and SPKLU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHLT and SPKLU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHLT
1D Price
Change %
WHLT100%
N/A
SPKLU - WHLT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTGC - WHLT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SITS - WHLT
12%
Poorly correlated
-13.46%
IWSH - WHLT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBT - WHLT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More