SREDF
Price
$10.75
Change
-$0.62 (-5.45%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
6.05B
WHLT
Price
$0.08
Change
-$0.02 (-20.00%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.43M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SREDF vs WHLT

Header iconSREDF vs WHLT Comparison
Open Charts SREDF vs WHLTBanner chart's image
StoreBrand ASA
Price$10.75
Change-$0.62 (-5.45%)
Volume$568
Capitalization6.05B
Chase Packaging
Price$0.08
Change-$0.02 (-20.00%)
Volume$38.5K
Capitalization1.43M
SREDF vs WHLT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SREDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SREDF vs. WHLT commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SREDF is a Hold and WHLT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SREDF: $10.75 vs. WHLT: $0.08)
Brand notoriety: SREDF and WHLT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Conglomerates industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SREDF: 100% vs. WHLT: 120%
Market capitalization -- SREDF: $6.05B vs. WHLT: $1.43M
SREDF [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $6.05B. WHLT’s [@Financial Conglomerates] market capitalization is $1.43M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.72B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SREDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWHLT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SREDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WHLT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SREDF is a better buy in the long-term than WHLT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SREDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WHLT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SREDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • WHLT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WHLT is a better buy in the short-term than SREDF.

Price Growth

SREDF (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WHLT (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -1.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

WHLT is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-1.49% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SREDF($6.05B) has a higher market cap than WHLT($1.43M). WHLT YTD gains are higher at: 185.714 vs. SREDF (-3.932). SREDF has more cash in the bank: 18.1B vs. WHLT (432K). SREDF has higher revenues than WHLT: SREDF (42.7B) vs WHLT (0).
SREDFWHLTSREDF / WHLT
Capitalization6.05B1.43M423,373%
EBITDAN/A-53.86K-
Gain YTD-3.932185.714-2%
P/E Ratio8.52N/A-
Revenue42.7B0-
Total Cash18.1B432K4,189,815%
Total Debt54.9BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SREDF vs WHLT: Fundamental Ratings
SREDF
WHLT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
18100
SMR RATING
1..100
10094
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6035
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9410
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SREDF's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WHLT (80). This means that SREDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

SREDF's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for WHLT (100). This means that SREDF’s stock grew significantly faster than WHLT’s over the last 12 months.

WHLT's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SREDF (100). This means that WHLT’s stock grew similarly to SREDF’s over the last 12 months.

WHLT's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as SREDF (60). This means that WHLT’s stock grew similarly to SREDF’s over the last 12 months.

WHLT's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SREDF (94). This means that WHLT’s stock grew significantly faster than SREDF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SREDFWHLT
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SREDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WHLT
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WBUY8.340.34
+4.25%
Webuy Global Ltd
NTIC8.280.08
+0.98%
Northern Technologies International Corp
TEO8.95N/A
N/A
Telecom Argentina SA
WBA11.47-0.02
-0.17%
Walgreens Boots Alliance
HKD1.79-0.02
-1.10%
AMTD Digital

SREDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SREDF has been loosely correlated with MSSUF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SREDF jumps, then MSSUF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SREDF
1D Price
Change %
SREDF100%
N/A
MSSUF - SREDF
65%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NETDU - SREDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGLO - SREDF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
STJO - SREDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WHLT - SREDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WHLT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WHLT and SPKLU have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WHLT and SPKLU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WHLT
1D Price
Change %
WHLT100%
N/A
SPKLU - WHLT
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RTGC - WHLT
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SITS - WHLT
12%
Poorly correlated
-13.46%
IWSH - WHLT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRBT - WHLT
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More