SRGHY
Price
$14.97
Change
+$0.08 (+0.54%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
8.15B
WLWHY
Price
$3.55
Change
+$0.35 (+10.94%)
Updated
Feb 19 closing price
Capitalization
2.82B
Ad is loading...

SRGHY vs WLWHY

Header iconSRGHY vs WLWHY Comparison
Open Charts SRGHY vs WLWHYBanner chart's image
Shoprite Holdings
Price$14.97
Change+$0.08 (+0.54%)
Volume$1.48K
Capitalization8.15B
Woolworths Holdings
Price$3.55
Change+$0.35 (+10.94%)
Volume$349
Capitalization2.82B
SRGHY vs WLWHY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SRGHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRGHY vs. WLWHY commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRGHY is a StrongBuy and WLWHY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (SRGHY: $14.97 vs. WLWHY: $3.55)
Brand notoriety: SRGHY and WLWHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Department Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRGHY: 26% vs. WLWHY: 45%
Market capitalization -- SRGHY: $8.15B vs. WLWHY: $2.82B
SRGHY [@Department Stores] is valued at $8.15B. WLWHY’s [@Department Stores] market capitalization is $2.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Department Stores] industry ranges from $12.34T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Department Stores] industry is $4.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRGHY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWLWHY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SRGHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WLWHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both SRGHY and WLWHY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRGHY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SRGHY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

SRGHY (@Department Stores) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while WLWHY (@Department Stores) price change was +10.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Department Stores industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Department Stores (+0.71% weekly)

A department store sells a wide variety of consumer goods under different “departments,” including (but not necessarily limited to) apparel, household appliances, home furnishings, personal care products, cosmetics, consumer electronics. During healthy macroeconomic conditions, consumers typically won’t shy away from big-ticket purchases; but during a downturn, consumer spending might get limited to the most necessary/daily essentials. Several department stores purchase items on bulk from manufacturers for resale to consumers at a profit. Some of the largest department stores companies in the U.S. include Kohl’s Corporation, Macy’s Inc., and Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRGHY($8.15B) has a higher market cap than WLWHY($2.82B). SRGHY (23.08) and WLWHY (23.00) have similar P/E ratio . WLWHY YTD gains are higher at: 2.899 vs. SRGHY (-3.045). SRGHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 21B vs. WLWHY (8.61B). SRGHY has higher revenues than WLWHY: SRGHY (230B) vs WLWHY (76.5B).
SRGHYWLWHYSRGHY / WLWHY
Capitalization8.15B2.82B289%
EBITDA21B8.61B244%
Gain YTD-3.0452.899-105%
P/E Ratio23.0823.00100%
Revenue230B76.5B301%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRGHY vs WLWHY: Fundamental Ratings
SRGHY
WLWHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2947
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6055
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4116
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WLWHY's Valuation (12) in the null industry is in the same range as SRGHY (18). This means that WLWHY’s stock grew similarly to SRGHY’s over the last 12 months.

SRGHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as WLWHY (47). This means that SRGHY’s stock grew similarly to WLWHY’s over the last 12 months.

SRGHY's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as WLWHY (100). This means that SRGHY’s stock grew similarly to WLWHY’s over the last 12 months.

WLWHY's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as SRGHY (60). This means that WLWHY’s stock grew similarly to SRGHY’s over the last 12 months.

WLWHY's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is in the same range as SRGHY (41). This means that WLWHY’s stock grew similarly to SRGHY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRGHY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SRGHY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DASCX18.28-0.18
-0.98%
Dean Small Cap Value
GFFDX85.23-1.45
-1.67%
Invesco Global Focus R5
AEYCX32.86-0.60
-1.79%
American Century Equity Growth C
DCCCX24.20-0.62
-2.50%
Macquarie Small Cap Core C
ASCGX19.27-0.79
-3.94%
Lisanti Small Cap Growth

SRGHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRGHY and WLWHY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRGHY and WLWHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRGHY
1D Price
Change %
SRGHY100%
+0.54%
WLWHY - SRGHY
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KSS - SRGHY
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
MAKSY - SRGHY
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
DDS - SRGHY
13%
Poorly correlated
-4.17%
M - SRGHY
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.13%
More

WLWHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLWHY and SRGHY have been poorly correlated (+18% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLWHY and SRGHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLWHY
1D Price
Change %
WLWHY100%
N/A
SRGHY - WLWHY
18%
Poorly correlated
+0.54%
NWRLY - WLWHY
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TOKUY - WLWHY
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYKKY - WLWHY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RYKKF - WLWHY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More