SRHBY
Price
$9.86
Change
+$0.48 (+5.12%)
Updated
Aug 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.51B
SWZCF
Price
$723.50
Change
-$16.52 (-2.23%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
37.85B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRHBY vs SWZCF

Header iconSRHBY vs SWZCF Comparison
Open Charts SRHBY vs SWZCFBanner chart's image
Starhub
Price$9.86
Change+$0.48 (+5.12%)
Volume$500
Capitalization1.51B
Swisscom AG
Price$723.50
Change-$16.52 (-2.23%)
Volume$39
Capitalization37.85B
SRHBY vs SWZCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SRHBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRHBY vs. SWZCF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRHBY is a Buy and SWZCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SRHBY: $9.63 vs. SWZCF: $723.50)
Brand notoriety: SRHBY and SWZCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Major Telecommunications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRHBY: 172% vs. SWZCF: 98%
Market capitalization -- SRHBY: $1.51B vs. SWZCF: $37.85B
SRHBY [@Major Telecommunications] is valued at $1.51B. SWZCF’s [@Major Telecommunications] market capitalization is $37.85B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Telecommunications] industry ranges from $284.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Telecommunications] industry is $19.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRHBY’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSWZCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • SRHBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SWZCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRHBY is a better buy in the long-term than SWZCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRHBY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWZCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRHBY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SWZCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SRHBY and SWZCF are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SRHBY (@Major Telecommunications) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SWZCF (@Major Telecommunications) price change was -2.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Telecommunications industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.02%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Telecommunications (-0.28% weekly)

Major telecommunications include companies that make communication possible across the globe – by providing voice and data transmission via multiple channels such as phone or the Internet, through airwaves or cables, through wires or wirelessly. The ease with which we connect with anyone, anywhere in the world is thanks in large part to the infrastructure created by the telecom industry. Some major telecom players include AT&T Inc., Verizon Communications Inc. and Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SWZCF($37.9B) has a higher market cap than SRHBY($1.51B). SWZCF has higher P/E ratio than SRHBY: SWZCF (22.62) vs SRHBY (18.68). SWZCF YTD gains are higher at: 30.126 vs. SRHBY (14.472). SWZCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.27B vs. SRHBY (449M). SWZCF has higher revenues than SRHBY: SWZCF (13B) vs SRHBY (2.39B).
SRHBYSWZCFSRHBY / SWZCF
Capitalization1.51B37.9B4%
EBITDA449M5.27B9%
Gain YTD14.47230.12648%
P/E Ratio18.6822.6283%
Revenue2.39B13B18%
Total CashN/A200M-
Total DebtN/A3.73B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRHBY vs SWZCF: Fundamental Ratings
SRHBY
SWZCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4596
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1742
SMR RATING
1..100
4965
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4949
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2620
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRHBY's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWZCF (97). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWZCF’s over the last 12 months.

SRHBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as SWZCF (42). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew similarly to SWZCF’s over the last 12 months.

SRHBY's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SWZCF (65). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew similarly to SWZCF’s over the last 12 months.

SRHBY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as SWZCF (49). This means that SRHBY’s stock grew similarly to SWZCF’s over the last 12 months.

SWZCF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as SRHBY (26). This means that SWZCF’s stock grew similarly to SRHBY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRHBYSWZCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
9%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
24%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
18%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
30%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRHBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWZCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PACB1.270.03
+2.42%
Pacific Biosciences of California
LSF5.750.03
+0.52%
Laird Superfood
VACHU11.50N/A
N/A
Voyager Acquisition Corp
SRAD30.87-0.03
-0.10%
Sportradar Group AG
CCB109.84-6.04
-5.21%
Coastal Financial Corp

SRHBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRHBY and MYTEF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRHBY and MYTEF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRHBY
1D Price
Change %
SRHBY100%
N/A
MYTEF - SRHBY
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SWZCF - SRHBY
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TEFOF - SRHBY
4%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
TIAIY - SRHBY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SMNUF - SRHBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SWZCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWZCF has been loosely correlated with SCMWY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWZCF jumps, then SCMWY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWZCF
1D Price
Change %
SWZCF100%
N/A
SCMWY - SWZCF
45%
Loosely correlated
+2.16%
TELNY - SWZCF
15%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
TELNF - SWZCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
SRHBY - SWZCF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TEFOF - SWZCF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
More