SRLZF
Price
$0.11
Change
-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
28.77M
SXOOF
Price
$0.05
Change
+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
14.66M
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRLZF vs SXOOF

Header iconSRLZF vs SXOOF Comparison
Open Charts SRLZF vs SXOOFBanner chart's image
Salazar Resources
Price$0.11
Change-$0.01 (-8.33%)
Volume$50K
Capitalization28.77M
St Georges Eco Mng
Price$0.05
Change+$0.01 (+25.00%)
Volume$81.54K
Capitalization14.66M
SRLZF vs SXOOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SRLZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRLZF vs. SXOOF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRLZF is a Hold and SXOOF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (SRLZF: $0.11 vs. SXOOF: $0.05)
Brand notoriety: SRLZF and SXOOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRLZF: 121% vs. SXOOF: 89%
Market capitalization -- SRLZF: $28.77M vs. SXOOF: $14.66M
SRLZF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $28.77M. SXOOF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $14.66M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRLZF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileSXOOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • SRLZF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • SXOOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, SRLZF is a better buy in the long-term than SXOOF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRLZF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SXOOF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRLZF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SXOOF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both SRLZF and SXOOF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

SRLZF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.97% price change this week, while SXOOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +5.57%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +42.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +308.83%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+5.57% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SRLZF($28.8M) has a higher market cap than SXOOF($14.7M). SRLZF YTD gains are higher at: 115.705 vs. SXOOF (31.944). SXOOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -1.51M vs. SRLZF (-2.3M). SXOOF has more cash in the bank: 1.95M vs. SRLZF (637K). SRLZF (0) and SXOOF (0) have equivalent revenues.
SRLZFSXOOFSRLZF / SXOOF
Capitalization28.8M14.7M196%
EBITDA-2.3M-1.51M152%
Gain YTD115.70531.944362%
P/E RatioN/A2.00-
Revenue00-
Total Cash637K1.95M33%
Total DebtN/A1.95M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRLZF vs SXOOF: Fundamental Ratings
SRLZF
SXOOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
561
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
98
Overvalued
98
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9694
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3864
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9379
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SRLZF's Valuation (98) in the null industry is in the same range as SXOOF (98). This means that SRLZF’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

SRLZF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SXOOF (100). This means that SRLZF’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's SMR Rating (94) in the null industry is in the same range as SRLZF (96). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to SRLZF’s over the last 12 months.

SRLZF's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as SXOOF (64). This means that SRLZF’s stock grew similarly to SXOOF’s over the last 12 months.

SXOOF's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as SRLZF (93). This means that SXOOF’s stock grew similarly to SRLZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRLZFSXOOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRLZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SXOOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMGZ0.30N/A
N/A
Genuine Marketing Group Inc.
BKFKY12.38N/A
N/A
Bakkafrost PF
CTGCF0.03N/A
N/A
CENTENARIO GOLD CORP.
WLDBF1.40-0.05
-3.59%
WILDBRAIN LTD.
NBGRY13.67-0.56
-3.97%
NATIONAL BK GREECE S A

SRLZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRLZF and RGLSF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRLZF and RGLSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRLZF
1D Price
Change %
SRLZF100%
-2.93%
RGLSF - SRLZF
30%
Poorly correlated
+4.90%
BDNNY - SRLZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
NEXA - SRLZF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
SYAAF - SRLZF
20%
Poorly correlated
+5.47%
UAMY - SRLZF
20%
Poorly correlated
-5.40%
More

SXOOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SXOOF and NEXA have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SXOOF and NEXA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SXOOF
1D Price
Change %
SXOOF100%
+18.75%
NEXA - SXOOF
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
BMTLF - SXOOF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SRLZF - SXOOF
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.93%
TLGRF - SXOOF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.15%
TCKRF - SXOOF
8%
Poorly correlated
-5.80%
More