SRTSF
Price
$13.94
Change
+$0.07 (+0.50%)
Updated
Apr 29 closing price
Capitalization
561.68M
UNLRF
Price
$0.11
Change
+$0.02 (+22.22%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
9.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

SRTSF vs UNLRF

Header iconSRTSF vs UNLRF Comparison
Open Charts SRTSF vs UNLRFBanner chart's image
Sarantis SA
Price$13.94
Change+$0.07 (+0.50%)
Volume$750
Capitalization561.68M
PT Unilever Indonesia Tbk
Price$0.11
Change+$0.02 (+22.22%)
Volume$180
Capitalization9.52B
SRTSF vs UNLRF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
SRTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SRTSF vs. UNLRF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SRTSF is a Hold and UNLRF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (SRTSF: $13.94 vs. UNLRF: $0.11)
Brand notoriety: SRTSF and UNLRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Household/Personal Care industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SRTSF: 100% vs. UNLRF: 1%
Market capitalization -- SRTSF: $561.68M vs. UNLRF: $9.52B
SRTSF [@Household/Personal Care] is valued at $561.68M. UNLRF’s [@Household/Personal Care] market capitalization is $9.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Household/Personal Care] industry ranges from $381.78B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Household/Personal Care] industry is $25.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SRTSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUNLRF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SRTSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UNLRF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UNLRF is a better buy in the long-term than SRTSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SRTSF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UNLRF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SRTSF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • UNLRF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SRTSF is a better buy in the short-term than UNLRF.

Price Growth

SRTSF (@Household/Personal Care) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while UNLRF (@Household/Personal Care) price change was +37.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Household/Personal Care industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.10%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Household/Personal Care (+1.91% weekly)

Household/Personal Care companies sell products for home cleaning and/or personal hygiene and grooming purposes. Products of this industry include detergents, shampoos, soaps, cosmetics, fabric conditioners and infant care fragrances. Procter & Gamble, Unilever, Estee Lauder and Colgate-Palmolive are some of the biggest names in the business. A lot of the products become a necessary part of people’s daily routine, and therefore the industry is relatively less vulnerable to macroeconomic downturns. At the same time, product quality, consumer safety, and ease of use are extremely critical factors for a company to survive competition and earn recognition in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UNLRF($9.52B) has a higher market cap than SRTSF($562M). UNLRF has higher P/E ratio than SRTSF: UNLRF (34.25) vs SRTSF (7.77). UNLRF YTD gains are higher at: 37.669 vs. SRTSF (25.079). UNLRF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.63T vs. SRTSF (74.1M). UNLRF has more cash in the bank: 2.99T vs. SRTSF (52.3M). SRTSF has less debt than UNLRF: SRTSF (85.1M) vs UNLRF (719B). UNLRF has higher revenues than SRTSF: UNLRF (40.05T) vs SRTSF (426M).
SRTSFUNLRFSRTSF / UNLRF
Capitalization562M9.52B6%
EBITDA74.1M6.63T0%
Gain YTD25.07937.66967%
P/E Ratio7.7734.2523%
Revenue426M40.05T0%
Total Cash52.3M2.99T0%
Total Debt85.1M719B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SRTSF vs UNLRF: Fundamental Ratings
SRTSF
UNLRF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
37100
SMR RATING
1..100
6212
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6759
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UNLRF's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as SRTSF (42). This means that UNLRF’s stock grew similarly to SRTSF’s over the last 12 months.

SRTSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UNLRF (100). This means that SRTSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than UNLRF’s over the last 12 months.

UNLRF's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SRTSF (62). This means that UNLRF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SRTSF’s over the last 12 months.

UNLRF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as SRTSF (51). This means that UNLRF’s stock grew similarly to SRTSF’s over the last 12 months.

UNLRF's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is in the same range as SRTSF (67). This means that UNLRF’s stock grew similarly to SRTSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SRTSFUNLRF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
26%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
11%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
SRTSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
UNLRF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PLTY63.370.94
+1.51%
YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF
SIXP29.420.12
+0.39%
AllianzIM US Lrg Cp 6M Bfr10 Mar/Sep ETF
SDHY16.870.02
+0.12%
PGIM Short Duration High Yield Opportunities Fund
USCA38.80N/A
N/A
Xtrackers MSCI USA Clmt Actn Eq ETF
OWNS17.06-0.03
-0.18%
CCM Affordable Housing MBS ETF

SRTSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SRTSF and UNLRF have been poorly correlated (+1% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SRTSF and UNLRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SRTSF
1D Price
Change %
SRTSF100%
N/A
UNLRF - SRTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
+22.37%
KITAF - SRTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPHCF - SRTSF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SKIN - SRTSF
0%
Poorly correlated
+8.06%
YSG - SRTSF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UNLRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UNLRF and RBGLY have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UNLRF and RBGLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UNLRF
1D Price
Change %
UNLRF100%
+22.37%
RBGLY - UNLRF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.67%
RBGPF - UNLRF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNLRY - UNLRF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNLYF - UNLRF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RPHCF - UNLRF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More