SSAAF
Price
$3.86
Change
-$0.14 (-3.50%)
Updated
Jan 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.43B
SZGPY
Price
$1.79
Change
+$0.07 (+4.07%)
Updated
Jan 28 closing price
Capitalization
1B
Ad is loading...

SSAAF vs SZGPY

Header iconSSAAF vs SZGPY Comparison
Open Charts SSAAF vs SZGPYBanner chart's image
SSab Swedish Steel AB
Price$3.86
Change-$0.14 (-3.50%)
Volume$500
Capitalization4.43B
Salzgitter AG
Price$1.79
Change+$0.07 (+4.07%)
Volume$248
Capitalization1B
SSAAF vs SZGPY Comparison Chart
Loading...
SSAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SZGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SSAAF vs. SZGPY commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSAAF is a Hold and SZGPY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (SSAAF: $3.86 vs. SZGPY: $1.79)
Brand notoriety: SSAAF and SZGPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Steel industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SSAAF: 53% vs. SZGPY: 11%
Market capitalization -- SSAAF: $4.43B vs. SZGPY: $1B
SSAAF [@Steel] is valued at $4.43B. SZGPY’s [@Steel] market capitalization is $1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Steel] industry ranges from $29.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Steel] industry is $4.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SSAAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSZGPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SSAAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SZGPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SZGPY is a better buy in the long-term than SSAAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SSAAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SZGPY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SSAAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SZGPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SZGPY is a better buy in the short-term than SSAAF.

Price Growth

SSAAF (@Steel) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SZGPY (@Steel) price change was +4.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Steel industry was +5.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.50%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Steel (+5.54% weekly)

The steel industry includes manufacturers of steel and steel-related products. Companies use iron ore and scrap steel to produce steel. The industry also includes companies involved in mining and marketing of steel products. Along with serving some of the domestic markets, U.S. steel output has, over the years, been used by international economies as well. Competition from imported steel has also increased over time. The industry could be susceptible to business cycles, since the element is an important input in industrial production. Some of the globally-renowned steel behemoths include Nucor Corporation, Vale, and ArcelorMittal SA.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSAAF($4.43B) has a higher market cap than SZGPY($1B). SZGPY has higher P/E ratio than SSAAF: SZGPY (42.91) vs SSAAF (3.35). SZGPY YTD gains are higher at: 13.683 vs. SSAAF (-10.023). SSAAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 14.9B vs. SZGPY (462M). SSAAF has more cash in the bank: 23.2B vs. SZGPY (582M). SSAAF has higher revenues than SZGPY: SSAAF (103B) vs SZGPY (10.1B).
SSAAFSZGPYSSAAF / SZGPY
Capitalization4.43B1B441%
EBITDA14.9B462M3,225%
Gain YTD-10.02313.683-73%
P/E Ratio3.3542.918%
Revenue103B10.1B1,020%
Total Cash23.2B582M3,986%
Total Debt9.59BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SSAAF vs SZGPY: Fundamental Ratings
SSAAF
SZGPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1941
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
1
Undervalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
85100
SMR RATING
1..100
6391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
922
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SSAAF's Valuation (1) in the null industry is in the same range as SZGPY (10). This means that SSAAF’s stock grew similarly to SZGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SSAAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as SZGPY (100). This means that SSAAF’s stock grew similarly to SZGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SSAAF's SMR Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as SZGPY (91). This means that SSAAF’s stock grew similarly to SZGPY’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SSAAF (84). This means that SZGPY’s stock grew somewhat faster than SSAAF’s over the last 12 months.

SZGPY's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SSAAF (92). This means that SZGPY’s stock grew significantly faster than SSAAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SSAAFSZGPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
30%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SSAAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SZGPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AIVBX17.160.12
+0.70%
American Funds International Vntg A
IRFIX8.160.05
+0.62%
Cohen & Steers International Realty I
BIICX10.280.04
+0.39%
BlackRock Multi-Asset Income Instl
VNSYX22.850.06
+0.26%
Natixis Vaughan Nelson Select Y
QDVCX12.93N/A
N/A
EquityCompass Quality Dividend C

SSAAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SSAAF and ANIOY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SSAAF and ANIOY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SSAAF
1D Price
Change %
SSAAF100%
N/A
ANIOY - SSAAF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSAAY - SSAAF
12%
Poorly correlated
+10.96%
NPSCY - SSAAF
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
SZGPY - SSAAF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NISTF - SSAAF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SZGPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SZGPY has been loosely correlated with NUE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SZGPY jumps, then NUE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SZGPY
1D Price
Change %
SZGPY100%
N/A
NUE - SZGPY
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.43%
CMC - SZGPY
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.84%
MT - SZGPY
30%
Poorly correlated
+2.15%
GGB - SZGPY
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.70%
CLF - SZGPY
26%
Poorly correlated
+2.34%
More