Ad is loading...
SSB
Price
$106.83
Change
+$2.01 (+1.92%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
62 days until earnings call
UCB
Price
$33.13
Change
+$0.64 (+1.97%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

SSB vs UCB

Header iconSSB vs UCB Comparison
Open Charts SSB vs UCBBanner chart's image
SouthState
Price$106.83
Change+$2.01 (+1.92%)
Volume$342.81K
CapitalizationN/A
United Community Banks
Price$33.13
Change+$0.64 (+1.97%)
Volume$546.82K
CapitalizationN/A
SSB vs UCB Comparison Chart
Loading...
SSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
SSB vs. UCB commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSB is a StrongSell and UCB is a StrongBuy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (SSB: $106.83 vs. UCB: $33.13)
Brand notoriety: SSB and UCB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: SSB: 65% vs. UCB: 87%
Market capitalization -- SSB: $6.48B vs. UCB: $3.13B
SSB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.48B. UCB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

SSB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileUCB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • SSB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • UCB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SSB is a better buy in the long-term than UCB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SSB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UCB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • SSB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UCB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UCB is a better buy in the short-term than SSB.

Price Growth

SSB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.32% price change this week, while UCB (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.25% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.42%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

SSB is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

UCB is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.42% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSB($6.48B) has a higher market cap than UCB($3.13B). UCB has higher P/E ratio than SSB: UCB (16.42) vs SSB (12.88). SSB YTD gains are higher at: 29.578 vs. UCB (14.170). SSB has more cash in the bank: 515M vs. UCB (201M). UCB has less debt than SSB: UCB (325M) vs SSB (482M). SSB has higher revenues than UCB: SSB (1.7B) vs UCB (872M).
SSBUCBSSB / UCB
Capitalization6.48B3.13B207%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.57814.170209%
P/E Ratio12.8816.4278%
Revenue1.7B872M195%
Total Cash515M201M256%
Total Debt482M325M148%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SSB vs UCB: Fundamental Ratings
SSB
UCB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6213
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
79
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3581
SMR RATING
1..100
1011
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4041
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2214
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UCB's Valuation (79) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SSB (83). This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to SSB’s over the last 12 months.

SSB's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UCB (81). This means that SSB’s stock grew somewhat faster than UCB’s over the last 12 months.

SSB's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (11). This means that SSB’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

SSB's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as UCB (41). This means that SSB’s stock grew similarly to UCB’s over the last 12 months.

UCB's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SSB (22). This means that UCB’s stock grew similarly to SSB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
SSBUCB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SSB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
UCB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGX11.940.11
+0.93%
Invesco Preferred ETF
BUFB32.380.16
+0.50%
Innovator Laddered Allocation Buffer ETF
FLDR50.130.02
+0.04%
Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF
EEMO16.43-0.01
-0.05%
Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Mom ETF
EOCT26.04-0.07
-0.28%
Innovator Emerg Mkts Pwr Bffr ETF™-Oct

UCB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UCB has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UCB jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UCB
1D Price
Change %
UCB100%
+1.97%
FFBC - UCB
92%
Closely correlated
+2.41%
ABCB - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+2.39%
SSB - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+1.92%
UBSI - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+0.82%
SBCF - UCB
91%
Closely correlated
+2.56%
More