Ad is loading...
SSCVX vs SSGSX
SSCVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts SSCVX vs SSGSX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value A
Price$16.01
Change+$0.26 (+1.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets356.84M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$41.78
Change+$0.72 (+1.75%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.44B
SSCVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSCVX vs. SSGSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSCVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.44B vs. SSCVX (357M). SSCVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: SSCVX (0.60) vs SSGSX (0.54). SSCVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: SSCVX (28 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSCVX (1.30) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SSCVX (7.00). SSCVX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SSCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: SSCVX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.71 vs. SSCVX (-18.53). SSCVX return over 5 years is better than : 24.28 vs. SSGSX (20.02).
| SSCVX | SSGSX | SSCVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -10.103 | -11.566 | 87% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 357M | 5.44B | 7% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.60 | 0.54 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | -18.53 | -13.71 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.39 | -10.63 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.28 | 20.02 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.83 | 5.67 | -420% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...