Ad is loading...
SSCVX vs SSGSX
SSCVX vs SSGSX Comparison
Open Charts SSCVX vs SSGSX
Columbia Select Small Cap Value A
Price$14.99
Change+$1.27 (+9.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets343.79M
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$38.61
Change-$1.79 (-4.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.42B
SSCVX vs SSGSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSCVX vs. SSGSX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSCVX is a Buy and SSGSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.42B vs. SSCVX (344M). SSCVX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: SSCVX (0.57) vs SSGSX (0.52). SSCVX was incepted earlier than SSGSX: SSCVX (28 years) vs SSGSX (26 years). SSCVX (1.30) and SSGSX (1.26) have similar cost to investors . SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. SSCVX (7.00). SSCVX (6%) and SSGSX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. SSCVX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: SSCVX (2000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -22.84 vs. SSCVX (-28.67). SSCVX return over 5 years is better than : 14.83 vs. SSGSX (9.75).
| SSCVX | SSGSX | SSCVX / SSGSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 1.26 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.30 | 1.26 | 103% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -21.689 | -19.599 | 111% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 2500 | 80% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 344M | 5.42B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.57 | 0.52 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | -28.67 | -22.84 | 126% |
| Returns for 3 years | -30.91 | -20.66 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.83 | 9.75 | 152% |
| Returns for 10 years | -34.94 | -4.90 | 712% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...