Ad is loading...
SSGSX vs TCFSCV
SSGSX vs TCFSCV Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TCFSCV
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.69
Change+$0.63 (+1.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.33B
Thrivent Core Small Cap Value
Price$9.31
Change+$0.15 (+1.64%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets302.39M
SSGSX vs TCFSCV Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.33B vs. TCFSCV (302M). TCFSCV pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TCFSCV (1.64) vs SSGSX (0.52). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TCFSCV: SSGSX (26 years) vs TCFSCV (3 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than TCFSCV (0.05). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TCFSCV (32.00). TCFSCV has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TCFSCV (0) vs SSGSX (2500). TCFSCV annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.63 vs. SSGSX (-14.61).
| SSGSX | TCFSCV | SSGSX / TCFSCV | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.05 | 2,520% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.05 | 2,520% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.720 | -13.072 | 105% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.33B | 302M | 1,766% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.64 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | -14.61 | -6.63 | 220% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.35 | 0.17 | -9,834% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.96 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 2.97 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...