Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs TCFSCV
SSGSX vs TCFSCV Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TCFSCV
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$42.16
Change-$0.26 (-0.61%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.53B
Thrivent Core Small Cap Value
Price$9.85
Change-$0.07 (-0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets325.04M
SSGSX vs TCFSCV Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.53B vs. TCFSCV (325M). TCFSCV pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TCFSCV (1.64) vs SSGSX (0.52). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TCFSCV: SSGSX (26 years) vs TCFSCV (3 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than TCFSCV (0.05). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TCFSCV (32.00). TCFSCV has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TCFSCV (0) vs SSGSX (2500). TCFSCV annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.77 vs. SSGSX (-10.67).
| SSGSX | TCFSCV | SSGSX / TCFSCV | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.05 | 2,520% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.05 | 2,520% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 3 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.197 | -8.030 | 115% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.53B | 325M | 1,700% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.64 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.67 | -5.77 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.60 | 7.86 | -148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.01 | N/A | - |
| Returns for 10 years | 8.10 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement