Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs TMVAX
SSGSX vs TMVAX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TMVAX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$45.32
Change-$0.05 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.73B
SSGSX vs TMVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. TMVAX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and TMVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.73B vs. TMVAX (108M). TMVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TMVAX (1.60) vs SSGSX (0.51). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TMVAX: SSGSX (26 years) vs TMVAX (21 years). TMVAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TMVAX (22.00). SSGSX (6%) and TMVAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. TMVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TMVAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). TMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.42 vs. SSGSX (-10.12). TMVAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.65 vs. SSGSX (21.66).
| SSGSX | TMVAX | SSGSX / TMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.34 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.64 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.283 | 1.075 | -212% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.73B | 108M | 5,302% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.60 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.12 | -5.42 | 187% |
| Returns for 3 years | -6.06 | -4.85 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.66 | 33.65 | 64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.38 | 5.02 | 326% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers