Ad is loading...
SSGSX vs TMVAX
SSGSX vs TMVAX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TMVAX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$40.40
Change+$3.07 (+8.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.01B
SSGSX vs TMVAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. TMVAX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and TMVAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.01B vs. TMVAX (88.3M). TMVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TMVAX (1.71) vs SSGSX (0.52). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TMVAX: SSGSX (26 years) vs TMVAX (21 years). TMVAX (1.64) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TMVAX (22.00). SSGSX (6%) and TMVAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. TMVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TMVAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). TMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -14.22 vs. SSGSX (-22.84). TMVAX return over 5 years is better than : 27.26 vs. SSGSX (9.75).
| SSGSX | TMVAX | SSGSX / TMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.34 | 94% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.64 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -19.599 | -17.939 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.01B | 88.3M | 5,673% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.52 | 1.71 | 30% |
| Returns for 1 year | -22.84 | -14.22 | 161% |
| Returns for 3 years | -20.66 | -22.93 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.75 | 27.26 | 36% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.90 | -20.64 | 24% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers