Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs TMVAX
SSGSX vs TMVAX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TMVAX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.30
Change+$0.86 (+1.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
SSGSX vs TMVAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. TMVAX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Buy and TMVAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. TMVAX (91.2M). TMVAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TMVAX (1.49) vs SSGSX (0.47). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TMVAX: SSGSX (26 years) vs TMVAX (21 years). TMVAX (1.78) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. TMVAX (22.00). SSGSX (6%) and TMVAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. TMVAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TMVAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). TMVAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.99 vs. SSGSX (-4.30). TMVAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.76 vs. SSGSX (20.51).
| SSGSX | TMVAX | SSGSX / TMVAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.47 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.78 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.022 | 5.560 | 0% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.64B | 91.2M | 6,181% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.47 | 1.49 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.30 | 3.99 | -108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 1.08 | 4.08 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.51 | 35.76 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.53 | 16.05 | 153% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement