Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs TSLAX
SSGSX vs TSLAX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TSLAX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.29
Change+$0.15 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.38B
Transamerica Small Cap Value A
Price$4.70
Change+$0.02 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets82.13M
SSGSX vs TSLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. TSLAX commentary
Aug 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and TSLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.38B vs. TSLAX (82.1M). TSLAX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TSLAX (0.63) vs SSGSX (0.50). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TSLAX: SSGSX (26 years) vs TSLAX (13 years). TSLAX (1.41) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). TSLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 102.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). SSGSX (6%) and TSLAX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. TSLAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TSLAX (1000) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.25 vs. TSLAX (-18.19). SSGSX return over 5 years is better than : 14.49 vs. TSLAX (-40.08).
| SSGSX | TSLAX | SSGSX / TSLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.29 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.41 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.609 | -2.083 | 221% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 105% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 1000 | 250% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.38B | 82.1M | 6,548% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.50 | 0.63 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.25 | -18.19 | 34% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.04 | -27.20 | 26% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.49 | -40.08 | -36% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.13 | -56.47 | -23% |