Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs TSVQX
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TSVQX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.46
Change+$0.19 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.64B
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R6
Price$16.76
Change+$0.08 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets353.67M
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. TSVQX commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and TSVQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.64B vs. TSVQX (354M). TSVQX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TSVQX (1.66) vs SSGSX (0.51). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TSVQX: SSGSX (26 years) vs TSVQX (11 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than TSVQX (0.69). TSVQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). TSVQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TSVQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). SSGSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.73 vs. TSVQX (-13.29). TSVQX return over 5 years is better than : 62.23 vs. SSGSX (21.18).
| SSGSX | TSVQX | SSGSX / TSVQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.68 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.69 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 26 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.652 | -1.477 | 315% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.64B | 354M | 1,593% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.51 | 1.66 | 31% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.73 | -13.29 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.50 | -8.95 | -6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.18 | 62.23 | 34% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.53 | -22.69 | -60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement