Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs TSVQX
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs TSVQX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$47.07
Change+$0.20 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.52B
PGIM Quant Solutions Small-Cap Val R6
Price$18.53
Change+$0.08 (+0.43%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets377.32M
SSGSX vs TSVQX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. TSVQX commentary
Oct 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and TSVQX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SSGSX has more cash in the bank: 5.52B vs. TSVQX (377M). TSVQX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: TSVQX (1.49) vs SSGSX (0.48). SSGSX was incepted earlier than TSVQX: SSGSX (27 years) vs TSVQX (11 years). SSGSX (1.26) is less costly to investors than TSVQX (0.69). TSVQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. SSGSX (37.00). TSVQX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: TSVQX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). TSVQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.56 vs. SSGSX (-3.20). TSVQX return over 5 years is better than : 64.58 vs. SSGSX (27.06).
| SSGSX | TSVQX | SSGSX / TSVQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.68 | 185% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 0.69 | 183% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.378 | 9.451 | 15% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 5.52B | 377M | 1,464% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.48 | 1.49 | 32% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.20 | -0.56 | 570% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.97 | 3.00 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.06 | 64.58 | 42% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.80 | -6.60 | -361% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers