Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
SSGSX vs UBVRX
SSGSX vs UBVRX Comparison
Open Charts SSGSX vs UBVRX
Victory Sycamore Small Company Opp A
Price$44.37
Change-$0.09 (-0.20%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.96B
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Val R2
Price$75.47
Change-$0.37 (-0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.88B
SSGSX vs UBVRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
SSGSX vs. UBVRX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is SSGSX is a Hold and UBVRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBVRX has more cash in the bank: 8.88B vs. SSGSX (4.96B). UBVRX pays higher dividends than SSGSX: UBVRX (1.33) vs SSGSX (0.49). SSGSX was incepted earlier than UBVRX: SSGSX (27 years) vs UBVRX (13 years). UBVRX (1.62) is less costly to investors than SSGSX (1.26). SSGSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 37.00 vs. UBVRX (35.00). UBVRX has a lower initial minimum investment than SSGSX: UBVRX (0) vs SSGSX (2500). UBVRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -11.13 vs. SSGSX (-13.94). UBVRX return over 5 years is better than : 36.79 vs. SSGSX (2.50).
| SSGSX | UBVRX | SSGSX / UBVRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.55 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.26 | 1.62 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.243 | -5.615 | 76% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 4.96B | 8.88B | 56% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.49 | 1.33 | 37% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.94 | -11.13 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | -10.31 | -2.99 | 345% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.50 | 36.79 | 7% |
| Returns for 10 years | 12.84 | 38.09 | 34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement